High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Cases Under National Highways Act, 1956. The Court Enhanced Compensation for Landowners and Directed Authorities to Pay Additional Amounts.
9 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "duty enhancement"
850 result(s) found
Found 850 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Reference, Enhances Compensation for Acquired Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Determined Market Value Based on Comparable Sale Instances and Potential for Development, Rejecting Government's Valuation Method.
30 Nov -0001The case is a land acquisition reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, arising from the acquisition of land belonging to Godrej ...
- 169
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimant's Appeal in Motor Accident Case — Negligence of Tractor Driver Proved, Compensation Enhanced for Loss of Future Earnings Due to Permanent Disability.
23 Aug 2019The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimant, Babanna H. @ Babu, a loader, was injured on 20.03.2013 when the tract...
- 78
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Appeals for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Vehicle Accident Deaths of Minors, Lays Down Guidelines for Just Compensation. Court Holds That Parents Are Entitled to Compensation Based on Notional Income of Deceased Minor Child, Applying Second Schedule Multipliers and Adding Future Prospects.
12 Sep 2024The appeals arose from two motor vehicle accidents involving minor children. In MFA 11440/2011, a 14-year-old boy died when the motorcycle he was ridi...
- 15
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court in Capital Gains Tax Case — Accrual Occurs on Date of Award, Not Notification. Transfer of Capital Asset Under Section 45 of Income-tax Act, 1961 Is Complete Only When Compensation Is Determined by Collector's Award, Even if Possession Taken Earlier.
25 Aug 2020The case concerns the assessment year 1971-1972 for the assessee Amrik Singh HUF, whose land was acquired by the Haryana Government for a college play...
- 237
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, hears appeals challenging conviction for murder and related offences. Accused were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code for causing death by unlawful assembly, while the victim appealed for enhancement of sentence and additional convictions.
16 Jul 2015This judgment arises from three connected criminal appeals before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the judgmen...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part II IPC for Fatal Knife Assault, Dismisses Enhancement Appeal. Death of one accused abates appeal; remaining accused's conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder confirmed.
20 Aug 2019The judgment concerns two cross-appeals arising from an incident on 16/04/1999 where three accused persons assaulted the complainant and his friends w...
- 81
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases — Upholds Reference Court's Award Based on Sale Deed of Comparable Land. Market Value Determined at Rs. 1,00,000 per Hectare for Irrigated Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
18 Nov 2019The State of Maharashtra, through the Collector and other officers, filed six first appeals (FA Nos. 3714/2016 to 3719/2016) challenging the common ju...
- 100
High Court
Bombay High Court Issues Rule Nisi in Cyber Fraud Case Involving Unauthorized Withdrawals of Rs. 38.04 Lakh. Petitioner Claims Banks Breached RBI Guidelines on Internet Banking and Failed to Reverse Fraudulent Transactions.
6 Apr 2026The petitioner, a freelancer in business consultancy, maintained savings and current accounts with HDFC Bank since 2011 and 2016 respectively. On 14 J...
- 25
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 326 IPC for Grievous Hurt by Dangerous Weapon, Reduces Sentence for Criminal Intimidation. The court held that the prosecution proved the offence of causing grievous hurt with a dangerous weapon beyond reasonable doubt, but the conviction for criminal intimidation under Section 506 IPC was not sustainable due to lack of reliable evidence.
9 Mar 2015The judgment pertains to three connected matters arising from an incident where the appellants, Shriram Jethe and Shivaji Pawal, were convicted by the...
- 51
