Search Results for "delay in filing"

267 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 267 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Liberal Interpretation of Delay Condonation Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. High Court Erred in Dismissing Delay Condonation Application for 45 Days Without Considering Beneficial Nature of Legislation.

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the deceased, aged 26, died in a collision with a negligently parked truck on 15.04.2011. The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Execution of Foreign Decree Case, Holding Limitation Period of 12 Years Runs from Date of Foreign Decree. Bank of Baroda's Execution Petition Filed 14 Years After London Decree Held Time-Barred Under Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a dispute between Bank of Baroda (appellant) and Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. (respondent, successor of Vysya Bank) regarding the limita...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Award in E-Auction Dispute Due to Technical Glitch and Lack of Arbitrariness. Connectivity failure at service provider's end justified resumption of auction; High Court's interference in commercial decision set aside.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (BCCL) against the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court, which had quashed the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Delayed Appeal for Land Compensation Parity — Interest Denied for Delay Period. Landowners under same acquisition entitled to same compensation as others, but interest denied for 2928 days delay.

The Supreme Court allowed a civil appeal arising from a land acquisition matter where the appellant's land was acquired for the construction of the Hu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Order VIII Rule 6A CPC Mandatory for Filing Counterclaim Before Written Statement. Counterclaim Filed After Written Statement Is Not Permissible as Provision Imposes Embargo on Belated Filing.

The Supreme Court of India, in a three-judge bench, addressed a reference regarding the interpretation of Order VIII Rule 6A of the Code of Civil Proc...