Search Results for "controlling interest"

552 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 552 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Lessor in Rent Control Exclusion Case. Company That Lost Rent Control Protection Due to High Paid-Up Share Capital Cannot Regain It by Subsequent Reduction.

The case involves a dispute between M/s. Depe Global Shipping Agencies Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff/Lessor) and M/s. Mather and Platt (India) Ltd. (Defendant/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Reclassification of Mill Land as Non-NAINA Area Under DCPR 2034. Court upholds Monitoring Committee's decision that land not required for textile industry reverts to municipal reservation for public housing and amenity purposes.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Glider Buildcon Realtors Pvt Ltd and Mafatlal Industries Ltd challenging the decision of the Monitor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax TDS Case — Liquor Vendors Are Not 'Buyers' Under Section 206C of Income Tax Act, 1961. Court holds that excise contractors acquiring arrack under state-controlled system are excluded from definition of 'buyer' under Explanation (a)(iii) of Section 206C.

The appeal arose from a dispute under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning tax collection at source on the sale of alcoholic liquor. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — CMD's Ineligibility to Act as Arbitrator Renders Appointment Void Ab Initio. Express Agreement in Writing Under Section 12(5) Proviso Must Be Post-Dispute and Cannot Be Inferred from Pre-Dispute Conduct.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Bharat Broadband Network Limited (BBNL) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which had rejecte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Seeking Removal of Petrol Pumps Near Bibi Ka Maqbara Heritage Site. Court directs relocation of petrol pumps within 500 meters of the protected monument under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 and Heritage Regulations.

The petitioner, Mr. Shahid Aslam, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking the removal of petrol pum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Zilla Parishad Councillor for Having Three Children Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. Family Planning Policy Enforced Strictly to Curb Population Explosion.

The petitioner, Gautam s/o Rama Latke, was elected as a Councillor from the Anala (30) Constituency of Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad. He was aggrieved by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Restaurants Challenging Additional Conditions on Premises Licenses Imposed by Police Commissioner. Additional Conditions Held Ultra Vires as Not Authorized by Bombay Police Act, 1951 and Licensing Rules, 1960.

The petitioners, a group of restaurants holding premises licenses under the Licensing and Controlling Places of Public Amusement (Other than Cinemas) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Assessment on Flat Purchase Agreements. Agreements for sale of flats in a building under construction are agreements to sell, not conveyances, and stamp duty is to be assessed on the consideration stated in the agreement, not on market value.

The petitioner, M/s. Padmavati Construction Co., a partnership firm, was developing a plot of land in Chembur, Mumbai. The registered owner, Bombay Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 37(1AA) of MRTP Act in Constitutional Validity Case. Court Holds That State's Power to Modify Development Plans Does Not Violate 74th Amendment or Article 243W.

The petitioners, residents of Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3...