Search Results for "composite consideration"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "composite consideration"

957 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 957 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Group of Companies Doctrine to Larger Bench in Arbitration Dispute Over Software Agreement. Questions validity of applying the doctrine to bind non-signatory parent company to arbitration under Sections 8, 11, 35, and 45 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Cox & Kings Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, seekin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Bid in Tender for ACP Sheets — No Arbitrariness Found in MSRTC's Decision to Reject L-2 Bidder's Price Match Offer After L-1 Withdrawal.

14 Feb 2020

The Petitioner, Unistone Panels Pvt. Ltd., and its director Lalit Mittal, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Matter — Profit on Sale of Shares Held as Business Income and Not Capital Accretion. The Profit from Sale of Shares Held as Stock-in-Trade is Taxable as Business Income under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, Even If Part of Sale Price Attributable to Controlling Interest.

28 Nov 1967

The assessee, a private limited company, was engaged in share trading. From 1942 to 1948, it regularly dealt in shares of Elphinstone Mills, treating ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Against TDS Notices Issued to Turf Clubs Under Section 194B of Income Tax Act — Argued That Stake Money Is Not Winnings. Petitioners Contend That CBDT Circular No.467 Exempts Stake Money From TDS and That Such Payments Are Business Income Taxable Under Section 74A, Not Winnings Under Section 194B.

26 Sep 2014

The batch of writ petitions before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore arose from notices issued by the Income Tax Department to turf clubs in Ba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Wakf Tribunal Order Upholding Plaintiff's Title Over Wakf Property. The court held that the Wakf Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide the suit and that the plaintiff's suit was not barred by limitation.

14 Feb 2024

The case involves a dispute over Survey Gut No.66 of village Harsool, Aurangabad. The plaintiff, Pratapsingh s/o Nursing Kakarwal, filed a suit before...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition by Retired Partners in Debt Recovery Case Upholding DRT and DRAT Orders. Retired Partners Remain Liable for Original Bank Loan as Bank Did Not Formally Release Them Despite Reconstitution of Partnership Firm and Execution of Fresh Agreements with New Partners Under Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

16 Feb 2026

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by two retired partners of M/s. Srishti Components, a partnership firm, challenging orders of the Debts R...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Illegal Appropriation Under Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme — Petitioner Entitled to Benefit of KVSS for A.Y. 1987-88 Despite Prior Deposit Under Court Order. The court held that the appropriation of Rs.3,11,206/- by the Tax Recovery Officer towards tax demand for Assessment Year 1987-88 out of Rs.6,00,000/- deposited under High Court order was illegal, and the petitioner is entitled to benefit of Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 for the tax arrears of A.Y. 1987-88.

26 Jun 2020

The petitioner, M/s. Kuber Builders, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit — Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Swisskem Healthcare & Anr. — 'PANDERM' and 'POLYDERM+' Held Deceptively Similar. The Court held that the marks are structurally and phonetically similar, and the Defendant's use is likely to cause confusion, especially in medicinal products where a high degree of care is expected.

2 Jul 2019

The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the Defendants, Swisskem Healthcare and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Public Premises Act Case — Prima Facie Satisfaction Sufficient for Eviction Notice. The Court held that the Estate Officer's satisfaction under Section 4(1) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 need only be prima facie based on material on record, and the appellate court cannot substitute its own findings at the notice stage.

10 May 2024

The case involves a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by a government company (wholly owned by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Arbitrability of Disputes Between Developer and Non-Signatory Member of Cooperative Society Under Development Agreement. Issue Involves Permissibility of Invoking Arbitration Clause Against Dissenting Member Not Party to Agreement.

6 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from the redevelopment of a cooperative society's building in Mumbai. The applicant, a developer, entered into a Development Agreeme...

19 20 21 22 23

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)