Search Results for "advance refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Promotion in Cooperative Bank, Reverses High C...
Supreme Court Grants Leave and Examines High Court's Interpretation of Section 3...

Search Results for "advance refund"

606 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 606 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Petition Quashing Recovery from Gratuity in Pay Fixation Error Case. Recovery of Excess Payment Made to Deceased Government Employee Without Notice Violates Natural Justice and Cannot Be Deducted from Death Gratuity.

21 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Jayshri w/o Sanjay Chandode, is the widow of Sanjay Bhagirath Chandode, a government employee who worked as a peon in the office of Re...

High Court

High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Restoring Arbitral Award Set Aside by Single Judge. Limited Judicial Review Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Precludes Re-appreciation of Evidence Unless Award Shocks Conscience or Conflicts with Public Policy.

9 Mar 2026

The dispute arose between Appellant, a foreign company manufacturing biscuits in Zimbabwe, and Respondent, an Indian partnership firm, regarding the s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Non-Compliance of DRP Directions Within Statutory Time Limit Under Section 144C(13) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Failure to Complete Assessment Within One Month of Receiving DRP Directions Renders Transfer Pricing Addition Time-Barred and Non-Est.

10 Oct 2025

The Petitioner, Archroma International (India) Private Limited (formerly Huntsman International (India) Private Limited), filed a Writ Petition under ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Unexplained Delay and Unworkability - Restores Parties to Original Positions Under Article 142. Unexplained delay of over three years in pronouncing award and failure to finally settle disputes renders award contrary to public policy under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court of India considered two civil appeals arising from an arbitral award that was reserved on 28.07.2012 but pronounced only on 16.03.20...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision Quashing Labour Cess Demand Under Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Cess Act, 1996. The Court held that the cess demand was invalid as the contract work did not constitute 'building or other construction work' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996, and the levy under Sections 3(1) and (2) of the Cess Act was not applicable.

12 May 2021

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil appellate jurisdiction, addressed a special leave petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Amount Under Joint Note. The court held that the three-day condition imposed by the bank was arbitrary and unreasonable, and that the petitioner's substantive right to pension could not be defeated by a procedural technicality.

18 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

18 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Set-Off Under Rule 41D for Export Sales of Exempted Pens. The court held that exemption notifications under Section 41 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 do not bar the claim for set-off under Rule 41D of the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 for export sales of fountain pens and ball pens.

14 Oct 2014

The case involves two sales tax references (No.12 and 13 of 2006) filed by M/s. Anand International, a partnership concern manufacturing, selling, and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Court upholds award granting compensation for work done, security deposit refund, and loss of profit under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

2 Jul 2012

The Union of India, through the Chief Project Manager (Conversion), Central Railway, Mumbai, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Sale Agreement Due to Failure to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Appellants failed to demonstrate financial capacity and timely performance under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

12 Jan 2010

The appellants, Hemant M. Deshmukh, Ashok Varma, and Gyanchand D. Oswal, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 21/12/199...

19 20 21 22 23

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)