Search Results for "Tahsildar Office"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Tahsildar Office"

1158 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1158 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines MCD's Recovery Notices Against MEPIDL for Territorial Overreach. Cross-Petitions on Attachment of Assets Outside Delhi Under DMC Act, 1957.

1 Feb 2023

The dispute arose from a contract dated 28th September 2017 between MEP Infrastructure Developers Limited (MEPIDL), a Mumbai-based enterprise, and the...

High Court

High Court Considers Quo Warranto Petition Alleging Illegal Appointment Against Non-Notified BCT Post in KIADB. Petition Argues That Appointment in Contravention of Advertised Reservation Is Void Ab Initio Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

8 May 2020

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a registered society representing Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe, and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Deputy Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Procedural Irregularities in Notice Period and Meeting Conduct Render Motion Invalid. The court held that the mandatory 15-day notice period under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 was not complied with, and the meeting was not conducted properly, thus quashing the no-confidence motion.

8 Nov 2019

The petitioners, Indraraj Babulal Jaiswal and Sangitabai Laxman Shinde, were the Sarpanch and Deputy Sarpanch respectively of Grampanchayat Tembhurni....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Writ Petition (PIL) – Cause Title Only. No substantive judgment text provided.

21 Jun 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Public Interest Litigation Concerning Recruitment and Selection Process. Petition Challenges Appointments Made by State Authorities Alleging Irregularities in Selection.

21 Jun 2016

The judgment text provided is incomplete, containing only the case heading, date, court, judges, advocates, and a list of parties. The matter is a wri...

High Court

KAHC010059832012_1

21 Jun 2016

The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Public Interest Litigation Regarding Unspecified Government Action. The Case Involves Impleaded Respondents Including State Officials and Karnataka Public Service Commission.

21 Jun 2016

...

High Court

KAHC010366622012_1

21 Jun 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears Public Interest Litigation in WP No.27674/2012 concerning Karnataka Public Service Commission selections. Court's judgment text not provided; no specific legal finding available.

21 Jun 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Writ Petition and Sets Aside Additional Collector's Order Invalidating No-Confidence Motion Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Distinction Between No-Confidence Motion and Censure Motion Applied. No-Confidence Motion Need Not Set Out Grounds or Charges; Motion Passed by Seven Out of Eight Members Validly Held.

22 Nov 2013

The writ petition was filed by seven members of the Gram Panchayat of Kabansangvi, Ta. Chakur, District Latur, challenging an order of the Additional ...

19 20 21 22 23

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)