Search Results for "Section 34(1)"

997 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 997 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Ban on Transport of Banned Food Products Through Maharashtra. Inter-State Transport of Banned Products Not Prohibited Under Section 30(2)(a) of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

The petitioners, including the driver, cleaner, owner of a truck, and a transporter, challenged an order dated 15/7/2020 issued by the Food Safety Com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted by High Court in Murder Case Due to Lack of Reasoning and Failure to Consider Criminal Antecedents. The High Court's orders granting bail were cryptic and did not consider the gravity of the offence or the criminal antecedents of the accused.

The appeals were filed by the informant-appellant, the mother of the deceased Rupesh Kumar, challenging the orders dated 22.07.2021 and 13.09.2021 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Extortion Case After Compromise Between Accused and Informant. Offence of Extortion Not Made Out as No Money Changed Hands, and Other Offences Were Compoundable.

The applicants filed a criminal application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No. 214/2019 registered at Police Station Nagpuri Gate, Amr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Caste Scrutiny Committee Order Cancelling Scheduled Caste Certificate Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Committee Failed to Provide Documents and Opportunity to Cross-Examine Complainant, Rendering Proceedings Void Under Maharashtra Act No. XXIII of 2001.

The petitioner, Bhanudas Hona Gajbhiv, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Scheduled Cast...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Enhancement of Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Procedural Violation — High Court's Suo Motu Enhancement Without Notice Held Illegal. Enhancement of Sentence from 7 to 10 Years in Accused's Own Appeal Violates Section 386 Proviso CrPC and Principles of Natural Justice.

The appellant, Kumar Ghimirey, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO Act, 2012) under Section 9/10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Accident Case — Insurance Company Liable for Negligent Parking of Vehicle. Truck parked without indication on highway causing accident; insurer held jointly liable with owner for compensation under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 13th March 2009, when the respondent no.1, a minor aged 10 years, was traveling in a Tata Magic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of POCSO and IPC Proceedings on Compromise Between Accused and Complainant Who Later Married. Marriage Between Accused and Complainant Leads to Quashing of FIR Under Section 482 CrPC as Continuation Would Be Abuse of Process.

The applicants, Taj @ Arjun S/o. Ajay Mishra (accused) and Ragini Ashok Amarnani (complainant), jointly filed a criminal application under Section 482...