CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3931 OF 2016
14 Dec 2016The petitioner, a former PWD Minister of Maharashtra, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging his ar...
Search Results for "RTO office"
251 result(s) found
Found 251 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Charge Sheet in Lokayukta Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of PC Act. Petitioner, a retired Superintendent, was charged under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 without prior sanction from competent authority, rendering proceedings invalid.
19 Dec 2019The petitioner, Sri S.V. Nandaraju, a retired Superintendent, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 Cr.P.C...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Councilor Under Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Act, 1986 for Joining Rival Party. Newspaper Reports of Joining Shiv Sena Constitute Sufficient Evidence of Voluntarily Giving Up Membership Under Section 3(1)(a) of the Act.
13 Apr 2015The Petitioner, Mahesh Vishnupant Kothe, was a councilor of the Solapur Municipal Corporation elected in 2012 on an Indian National Congress ticket. H...
- 141
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Writ Appeals on Recruitment and Reservation in Primary and Secondary Education Department. Dispute Arises from Selection Process for Backward Classes Welfare Department Posts and Alleged Irregularities in Admissions/Centralised Admission Cell Procedures.
12 Oct 2023A Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ appeals filed by 43 appellants against the State of Karnataka, its education dep...
- 52
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Applicant in Cheating and Criminal Breach of Trust Case — No Custodial Interrogation Required as Applicant Cooperated with Investigation. Applicant alleged to have induced complainant to invest in a company, but court found no prima facie case of dishonest intention and noted that the applicant had joined investigation and was not required for further custodial interrogation.
30 Jan 2026The applicant, Pranay Atul Mehta, filed an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking pre-arrest bail in connection...
- 192
High Court
High Court partly allowed Revision Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case -- Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act Upheld However order for imposition of cost set aside -- Petitioner Challenge to Conviction and Sentence Fails
27 Jan 2026The High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition challenging conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act -- The petitioner was con...
- 672
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging PMLA Attachment Orders for Non-Prosecution. Petitioners failed to appear or file written submissions despite multiple adjournments, leading to dismissal for default.
16 Sep 2025The petitioners, Krishna Shantaram Chamankar, Prasanna Shantaram Chamankar, and K.S. Chamankar Enterprises, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of...
- 46
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Workmen Compensation Case — Employer-Employee Relationship Established. The court upheld the Commissioner's finding that the deceased were employees of the respondent under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, and that the insurance company was liable to pay compensation.
26 Aug 2022The case involves two appeals filed by the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 28.02.2011 passed by the Labour Officer an...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL and Upholds Award of Emergency Medical Services Tender to Consortium. Court Finds No Irregularities in Tender Process; Holds that PIL Was Not Bona Fide and Should Be Proceeded Suo Motu.
8 Apr 2025The matter involved a public interest litigation (PIL) and a connected writ petition arising from a tender for the Maharashtra Emergency Medical Servi...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Orders Restoration of Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act for Forcible Dispossession. Plaintiff Proved Prior Possession and Forcible Ouster by Defendant with Armed Men, Entitling Him to Summary Remedy Without Proof of Title.
11 Aug 2005The plaintiff, Om Nath Chudamani Sharma, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking restoration of possession of Flat No. ...
- 129
