Search Results for "National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission"

313 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 313 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Complaint for Non-Prosecution Due to COVID-19 Pandemic. Delay in Filing Process Caused by Court Closures and Advocate's Inability to Present Envelopes Held to Be Sufficient Ground for Restoration.

The petitioner, Deepak Sharma, filed a consumer complaint (Case No. 153/2021) before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur-First...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Withdrawal of Second Appeal in Consumer Dispute Due to Settlement. The appellant sought withdrawal of the complaint after settlement, and the Commission disposed of the appeal as withdrawn without adjudicating on merits.

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) was hearing a second appeal filed by Sreenivasan, proprietor of Garudan Appallam Company, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Life Insurance Claim Repudiation Case Due to Suppression of Material Facts. Non-disclosure of existing life insurance policies at the time of proposal constitutes material suppression, entitling insurer to repudiate claim under Section 45 of the Insurance Act, 1938.

The present appeal arises from an order dated 28.05.2019 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, dismissing the appellant's...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCDRC Order Compelling Amendment of Consumer Complaint in Insurance Claim Dispute. Complainant is Dominus Litis and Cannot Be Forced to Amend Pleadings.

The appellant, M/s Acme Cleantech Solutions Private Limited, filed a consumer complaint before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation Award in Medical Negligence Case Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court found deficiency in service due to inadequate post-operative monitoring and delayed intervention in treating a patient with aortic aneurysm, leading to death and warranting compensation.

The dispute arose from a complaint filed by the legal heirs of a deceased patient, Dinesh Jaiswal, against Bombay Hospital & Medical Research Centre a...