Search Results for "More beneficial scheme"

672 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 672 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Withdrawal of Eligibility Communication Under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Interpretation of Section 9(c) of DTVSV Act: Pending criminal proceedings without charge-sheet or not relating to tax matters do not bar eligibility.

The petitioner, Reliance Industries Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the withdrawal of a communication dated 21st October 2020 issued by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Caste Validity Cancellation by Scrutiny Committee. Petitioners failed to prove tribal origin and continuous residence in scheduled area, leading to cancellation of caste certificates.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by 70 individuals challenging the orders of the Caste Scrutiny Committee, which cancelled their cast...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Employee Retired Prematurely Based on Deemed Age — Resolution Cannot Override Service Rules. The Court held that the Board's resolution deeming age as 18 on appointment date could not reduce the actual retirement age under Rule 73 of the Bihar Service Code.

The appellant, Gopal Prasad, was appointed as Calligraphist-cum-Assistant of the Bihar School Examination Board on 20 May 1970 at about 15½ years of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Cooperative Bank CEO Appointment Dispute — Upholds Apex Society's Power to Depute Cadre Officers. Section 54(3) of Chhattisgarh Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 obligates District Central Cooperative Bank to accept CEO deputed by State Cooperative Bank from its cadre.

The dispute arose from the appointment of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the first respondent, Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, a District C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...