Search Results for "Milind case"

1117 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1117 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Proceedings Under Public Premises Act — Amendment and Show Cause Notice Quashed for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice

The petitioner, Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Pvt Ltd, a tenant in a premises owned by the respondent, The New India Assurance Company Ltd, challenged ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder Conviction Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for causing death by iron rod blows on head; appeal dismissed as prosecution proved case beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ajay Ram Pandit, was convicted by the Trial Court for the murder of an unknown pedestrian under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Age Evidence and Consensual Relationship. Victim's Age Not Proved Below 18, and Sexual Intercourse Was Consensual, Leading to Acquittal Under Sections 363, 376 IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Yadav Chandoba Dawlekar, was convicted by the Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge-4, Nanded, in Special Case (POCSO) No.19 of 2015 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convicts' Emergency Parole Petition for Suppression of Facts and Misleading Statements. Petitioners convicted in 1996 Bombay Blast case sought emergency parole under Maharashtra Prisons Rules but suppressed material facts regarding their parole history and overstays.

The petitioners, Asgar Kadar Sheikh and Mohd Yakub Abdul Majid Nagul, were convicts in the 1996 Bombay Blast case, serving sentences for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Records — Dispute Over Title Cannot Be Decided in Revenue Proceedings Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, ten individuals claiming to be the legal heirs of one Ganpat Surpame, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...