Search Results for "IPC Section 366"

384 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 384 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in POCSO Case for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault of Minor — Life Sentence Confirmed. Court holds that minor inconsistencies in victim's testimony do not undermine credibility when corroborated by medical evidence and prompt complaint.

The appellant-accused, Tabrez Rojuddin Ansari, was convicted by the learned Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Bharuch in Special POCSO Case...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Section 306 IPC Proceedings Against Appellants in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Ingredients and Orders Reinvestigation. Utterances Like 'Go and Die' Held Not Sufficient to Constitute Abetment Under Section 306 IPC.

The case arises from a tragic sequence of events involving two deaths. On 02.11.2022, the first appellant Ayyub lodged an FIR alleging that his son Zi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO Case for Kidnapping Minor Girl — Consent and Age Discrepancy Considered. Court held that where the victim is a minor but there is evidence of consent and the accused is young, bail may be granted with conditions under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

The petitioner, Mohammed Shahid Khaleel, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking regular bail in C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 366 and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Vishal Ramesh Bhalerao, was convicted by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 826 of 2012 for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 302 IPC for Fatal Head Injury Despite Acquittal of Co-Accused. The Court held that the sole eyewitness testimony, corroborated by medical evidence and recovery, was sufficient to sustain the conviction for murder.

The case involves an appeal by Kripal Singh against his conviction under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Yashwant. The incident occurred on 28 July ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Kidnapping, Rape, and Murder of Minor Girl Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory and Failure to Explain Under Section 106 Evidence Act Confirm Guilt Under Sections 366A, 376(2)(f), 302 IPC.

The appellant, Vijay Babasaheb Nanavare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No. 88 of 2006 for kidnapping a minor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Girl. Consistent Testimony of Prosecutrix and Medical Evidence of Pregnancy Confirm Offences Under Sections 363, 366-A, and 376 IPC.

The appellant, Ravindra @ Balu s/o Sonaji Hivrale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for offences under Sections 363, 366-A,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case Due to Incriminating Circumstantial Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Together, False Report, and Discovery of Victim's Articles Established Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302 and 201 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The appellant, Shivaji Nanasaheb Shinde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kopargaon, for offences under Sections 302 and 201 of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Abduction Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Rape.

The appellant, Ratan @ Vishvajit Manoranjan Bose, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sections 363, 366...