Search Results for "Driving License Evidence"

469 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 469 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased Car Driver. Apportionment of Liability at 50% Each Based on Evidence of Rash Driving by Both Drivers.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of the deceased, Sudhasankar, who died in a collision between ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence and Lack of Proof of Income. Claimants failed to establish negligence of driver and income of deceased, leading to reduction in award.

The case involves multiple appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The accident occurred on 10.02.2014 when a motorcycle ridden by Devarajegowda ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 394 and 397 IPC Set Aside as Testimony of Sole Eyewitness Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Inconsistent.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by three accused persons convicted under Sections 394 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for robbery ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302, 392, 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Anandrao @ Anil Baban Kharade and Vijay Hiraman Bahare, were convicted by the adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay at Sewre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constable in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shrikrushna s/o Janardhan Chaudhari, was a Police Constable attached to Akot Police Station. On 15.1.1993, he along with other constabl...