Search Results for "Default bail"

1555 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1555 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Vitiated Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 found to be without application of mind, and prosecution evidence on demand and acceptance of bribe was mutually inconsistent.

The appellant, Ravindra s/o Marotrao Thakre, was convicted by the Special Court under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC set aside as sole eyewitness did not testify that the bus was driven rashly or negligently.

The applicant, Shivaji Damodar Karne, a bus driver employed with BEST, was convicted by the trial court (28th Esplanade Court, Mumbai) in CC No.40/P/9...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Accused Contends Non-Proof of Bribe Demand and Admission of Loan Repayment by Complainant.

The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 29.03.2005 in Special Case No.26/2003 passed by the Special Judge at Aurangabad, convicting the app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Criminal Appeals Against Conviction in Counterfeit Currency Case Under IPC Sections 489-B, 489-C and 120-B. Conviction Stemmed from Seizure of Fake Indian Currency Notes Valued at Rs.2,00,000, Where Accused Were Allegedly Involved in Trafficking via Courier from Dubai.

The matter pertains to three connected criminal appeals filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the High Court of Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yuvraj Chintaman Selokar, was a senior clerk in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aheri. He was convicted by the Special Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC — Single Stick Blow to Back Proved Fatal. The court held that the nature and force of the blow indicated intention to cause death or knowledge of likely death, rejecting the argument that it was a lesser offence.

The appellant, Ashok Kashinath Bhoir, was convicted by the III Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for the murder of his younger brother Vilas un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Sections 302, 324, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of the appellants (accused nos. 1 and 5 in some appeals, and accused no. 2 in another) by the Fa...