Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC — Single Stick Blow to Back Proved Fatal. The court held that the nature and force of the blow indicated intention to cause death or knowledge of likely death, rejecting the argument that it was a lesser offence.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 88
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Ashok Kashinath Bhoir, was convicted by the III Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for the murder of his younger brother Vilas under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The incident occurred after an altercation between the two brothers in their house, both under the influence of alcohol. The deceased Vilas quarreled with the appellant over the appellant's failure to arrange his marriage. The verbal debate escalated, and the appellant used a stick lying in the house to hit the deceased on his back as he was about to leave. Only one stick blow was given, causing the victim to fall down. The prosecution alleged that Vilas succumbed to the injury. Medical evidence revealed 11 injuries on the deceased, mostly abrasions and contusions from the altercation and fall. Injury No.10, a contusion 6" x 1-1/2" over the right lumbar back, was identified as fatal, with corresponding internal injuries described in the post-mortem report. The appellant challenged the conviction in the Bombay High Court. The court examined the evidence and found that the single blow was delivered with sufficient force to cause a fatal injury, indicating an intention to cause death or knowledge that the act was likely to cause death. The court upheld the conviction under Section 302 IPC, dismissing the appeal.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 IPC - Single Blow - Fatal Injury - The appellant gave a single stick blow on the back of the deceased during a quarrel over marriage. The blow caused a contusion 6" x 1-1/2" over the right lumbar back and internal injuries leading to death. The court held that the nature of the injury and the force used indicated intention to cause death or knowledge that the act was likely to cause death, thus convicting under Section 302 IPC. (Paras 1-2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant's act of giving a single stick blow to his younger brother during an altercation amounts to murder under Section 302 IPC or a lesser offence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction under Section 302 IPC upheld.

Law Points

  • Murder
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Single blow
  • Fatal injury
  • Intention to cause death
  • Knowledge of likely death
  • Altercation
  • Intoxication
  • Medical evidence
  • Post-mortem report
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (08) 58

Criminal Appeal No.1104 of 2003

2006-08-25

A.M. Khanwilkar

Mr. Manoj Bhatt for Appellant, Mr. Y.S. Shinde, APP for Respondent-State

Shri Ashok Kashinath Bhoir

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from the conviction and sentence for murder.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by the Sessions Court for murder of his younger brother.

Previous Decisions

The III Ad-hoc Addl. Sessions Judge, Thane convicted the appellant on November 29, 2002 in Session Case No.188 of 2002.

Issues

Whether the single stick blow inflicted by the appellant on the deceased amounts to murder under Section 302 IPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that only one blow was given and the offence may be lesser than murder. Prosecution contended that the fatal injury indicated intention to cause death or knowledge of likely death.

Ratio Decidendi

The nature and force of the single stick blow, causing a fatal injury, indicated intention to cause death or knowledge that the act was likely to cause death, thus constituting murder under Section 302 IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

Only one stick blow was given by the appellant. Medical evidence does indicate that the deceased had suffered about 11 injuries. Injury No.10 has been held to be fatal, which is described by the doctor as contusion 6" X 1-1/2" over right lumber back.

Procedural History

The appellant was chargesheeted and tried for murder under Section 302 IPC. The Sessions Court convicted him on November 29, 2002. He appealed to the Bombay High Court, which dismissed the appeal on August 25, 2006.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging E-Tender Policy for Labour Cooperative Societies. Government Resolution Mandating E-Tender for Contracts Above Rs. 3 Lakhs Upheld as Valid and Non-Discriminatory.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC — Single Stick Blow to Back Proved Fatal. The court held that the nature and force of the blow indicated intention to cause death or knowledge of likely death, rejecting the argu...