Search Results for "Bombay Rent Act Eviction"

1123 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1123 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Rent Control Eviction — Landlord's Bonafide Requirement for Wife's Business Upheld. Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 16(1)(g) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the tenant, Santosh Sampatrao Chhajed, against the concurrent judgments of the Small Causes Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petitions Challenging Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's Orders in Tenancy Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Tenant's Default in Rent Payment for Three Years Warrants Eviction Under Section 25(2) of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The dispute concerned agricultural lands bearing Survey Nos. 24/2A and 24/2B, originally leased by the landlord’s predecessor to the tenant’s pred...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Eviction Suit — Tenant's Denial of Title Forfeits Tenancy. Denial of Landlord's Title in Written Statement Constitutes Disclaimer Under Section 111(g) of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and Acceptance of Rent After Forfeiture Does Not Waive Notice.

The dispute pertains to a suit tenement on the ground floor of Plot no.99/2 situated in Nazul Sheet no.33B at Khamgaon, District Buldana, which was le...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Rent Recovery Suit — Hyderabad Rent Act Applicability During Pendency Does Not Bar Eviction Decree. Section 15(1) of Hyderabad Rent Act does not apply to decrees passed by civil court before the Act's extension to the area.

The respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 5,200 towards arrears of rent, damages, and possession of the suit house against the appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction of Tenant for Subletting and Unauthorised Assignment. Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 106 Notice Upheld as Valid.

The case involves a dispute over eviction of a tenant from premises in Mumbai. The original landlord, Mr. N.V. Baliga, owned a building at 257, Frere ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application in Trust Property Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Evidence. Applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for recall of witness under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC, as the application was filed after a long delay and lacked bona fides.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Sau. Sumita Pradeepkumar Dixit (original defendant No. 4) against the Gangadhar Makharia Chari...