Search Results for "1942 Government Order"

278 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 278 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision and Writ Petitions in Property Dispute, Upholding Appointment of Court Receiver. Court holds that disputes regarding title and possession cannot be decided in summary proceedings and that appointment of receiver is a discretionary remedy to preserve property.

The judgment arises from a property dispute concerning a piece of land in Mumbai. The original plaintiff, Amedmal Bhatewada (since deceased), filed a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Unexplained Investment in Silver Bullion. Section 69A of Income Tax Act, 1961 Applicable Where Assessee Fails to Explain Source of Acquisition of Silver Found in Possession.

The present appeals were filed by the Revenue against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which allowed the appeals of the assessee, Prakash Chan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Customs Sepoy for Disproportionate Assets and Wife for Abetment. Assets worth ₹1.15 crore found disproportionate to known income; wife convicted for aiding acquisition under Section 109 IPC read with Prevention of Corruption Act.

The case involves two appeals by Suresh Vinayak Morajkar (a Sepoy in the Customs & Central Excise Department) and his wife Sushma Suresh Morajkar agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Death Reference and Appeals Arising from 2000 Church Bomb Blast Case. Accused Allegedly part of Deendar Anjuman, charged with conspiracy under IPC Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A.

On December 17, 2014, the High Court of Karnataka delivered a common judgment in Criminal RC No. 3/2008, Criminal Appeal No. 1203/2008, and Criminal A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Amendment of Plaint to Add Alternative Claim Despite Limitation Bar. All necessary facts already pleaded; interest of justice warranted amendment under Order VI Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The dispute arose from a commercial transaction where the appellants, L. J. Leach and Company Ltd., filed a suit for damages against the respondents, ...