Search Results for "tender eligibility"

378 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 378 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Pronounces Judgment on Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Consortium's Financial Bid in Municipal Water Supply Tender; Court Examines Scope of Judicial Review Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, a consortium of three companies, challenged the decision of the Mira Bhayander Municipal Corporation's Standing Committee which disqu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Seeking Cancellation of Tender for Integrated Surveillance and City Operations Platform. Petitioner challenges work order issued to respondent on grounds of alleged non-compliance with pre-qualification criteria regarding turnover.

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging the tender process condu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Disqualification from Tender for Violation of Non-Compete Clause. Clause 8.31 of Licence Agreement Between GTI and JNPT Prohibited Promoters from Bidding for Competing Projects, and Subsequent Government Policy Could Not Be Read into Existing Contract.

The petitioner, APM Terminals B.V., a Dutch company, along with Container Corporation of India Ltd (CONCOR), formed a joint venture company called Gat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Forfeiture of Earnest Money in Toll Collection Tender Dispute. Variation in Contract Period from 90 Weeks to 52 Weeks Constitutes Counter-Offer, Not Acceptance, Thus Forfeiture Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s Abhay Construction, a partnership firm, submitted a tender to the Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. for collecti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down BCCL's Tender Decision for Arbitrariness and Discrimination. The Supreme Court upholds fairness and transparency in government contracts, ensuring compliance with constitutional principles.

The court held that government authorities, while exercising discretion in contractual matters, must ensure fairness, transparency, and equality. The ...