Search Results for "small family declaration"

689 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 689 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010422252008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part and Refers Question of Law to Larger Bench in MSMED Act Dispute. Registration Under Section 8 of MSMED Act, 2006 Not a Precondition for Reference Under Section 18, but Issue Requires Authoritative Determination by Three-Judge Bench.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by NBCC (India) Ltd. against the State of West Bengal and others, concerning a dispute with M/s Saket Infra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Lessor's Appeal Against Dismissal of Counterclaim for Eviction and Rent in Lease Dispute — Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 Section 41 Bars Counterclaim in High Court Original Suit for Specific Performance.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by the legal representatives of Mahadev P. Kambekar (original defendant/lessor) against the judgment of the Bombay...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification. Petitioners Alleged Notification Ultra Vires Article 246 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Seeking to Quash Demand Notices.

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, corporations, and individuals, including National ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Sub-Tenant in Rent Control Matter. Sub-tenant with paid-up capital less than Rs 1 crore held entitled to protection under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 despite tenant's exclusion under Section 3(1)(b).

The case involves a dispute over the applicability of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 to a sub-tenant. The applicant, Frick India Ltd, claimed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Arson Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence and Improper Application of Section 106 Evidence Act. Conviction under Sections 302 and 436 IPC Set Aside as Circumstances Did Not Form Complete Chain and Burden of Proof Was Misplaced.

The dispute involved a criminal appeal by the appellant against her conviction for murder under Section 302 and arson under Section 436 of the Indian ...