Search Results for "seized vehicles"

300 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 300 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Return of Driving License Pending Criminal Investigation in Fatal Accident Case. Division Bench Precedent Applied: Licensing Authority Cannot Initiate Action Until Criminal Court Finds Licensee Guilty.

The petitioner, M.Ramesh, an employee of the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (TNSTC), was driving a bus bearing Registration No.TN 33 N 3357 on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Death of 30-Year-Old Driver in Motor Accident Case. Apportionment of Contributory Negligence at 25% Upheld, but Multiplier Corrected from 17 to 16 and Future Prospects Added at 40% Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 29.05.2016, when Santosh Ghadi (deceased) was riding a motorcycle and dashed against a stationa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claims — Apportionment of Future Prospects and Multiplier Applied Correctly. The court held that the Tribunal erred in not considering future prospects and applied a higher multiplier for loss of dependency.

The appeals arise out of a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 22.12.2012 involving a lorry bearing registration No.KA-07/AA-1234. The claimants, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Discharge Accused in Fake Currency Case. Prima Facie Evidence of Involvement Found Sufficient for Trial Under Sections 489B and 489C IPC.

The appellant, Dipakbhai Jagdishchandra Patel, was implicated in a case involving the possession and sale of counterfeit Saudi Arabian Riyal currency ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yuvraj Chintaman Selokar, was a senior clerk in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aheri. He was convicted by the Special Ju...