Search Results for "sale not finalized"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "sale not finalized"

302 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 302 result(s)

High Court

Special Court at Bombay Allows Recovery Suit Against Notified Person Under Special Court Act, 1992 — Custodian's Claim for Notified Property Rejected Due to Lack of Evidence of Tainted Transaction. The court held that the suit for recovery of Rs. 6 Crores is maintainable and the Custodian failed to prove that the property is notified property under Section 3 of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992.

31 Jan 2019

The plaintiffs, Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta, Shri Ashwin S. Mehta, and M/s. ZEST Holdings Pvt. Ltd., filed Special Court Suit No. 1 of 2017 before the Special...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MHADA's Refusal to Register Proposed Cooperative Housing Society Under Section 22 of MHADA Act, 1976 — Held That a Proposed Society Is Entitled to Seek Registration and the Authority Cannot Refuse on Grounds of Non-Completion of Construction.

26 Mar 2015

The petitioners, Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan (Bavla Compound) Co-op. Housing Society (proposed) and its promoters, along with Darshan Developers, filed a wr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST on Exports Under Protest, Rejects Unjust Enrichment Claim. Payment under protest does not attract doctrine of unjust enrichment under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.

8 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Venus Jewel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging the refusa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Special Committee to Continue Adjudicating Pending Applications in Land Allotment Dispute - Applications Classified for Resolution by Special Committee or Court Based on Nature of Grievances. Special Committee Appointed Under Article 32 to Resolve Builder's Non-Adherence to Allotment Terms in Faridabad Residential Colony Project to Continue Dealing with Late Applications and Carve Out Own Procedure.

25 Apr 2025

The dispute originated from M/s Durga Builders (Pvt.) Ltd.'s purchase of approximately 235 acres of land in Faridabad, Haryana for establishing a resi...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Validity of Sanction for Prosecution in Discharge Petitions Filed by Accused Including a Cabinet Minister Under the Income Tax Act. Principal Question Examined: Whether the Principal Director of Income Tax is Competent to Grant Sanction Under Section 279 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

12 Nov 2019

The matter pertained to three criminal revision petitions filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Caste Validity Certificate and Rejection of Nomination in Lok Sabha Elections — Caste Scrutiny Committee Lacks Power of Review Under Section 7 of Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000. The Court held that a validity certificate issued under Section 6 of the Act cannot be cancelled by the Committee without express statutory authority and without following principles of natural justice.

24 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Rashmi Barve, a Zilla Parishad member, had obtained a caste validity certificate dated 17/02/2020 from the District Caste Certificate ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging the Validity of State Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases. The Petitioners Seek Declaration that the Notification is Ultra Vires the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and the Constitution.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Injunction Application in Redevelopment Dispute and Holds Civil Suit Not Barred by Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Developer's Claim for Specific Performance of Development Agreement Against Co-operative Housing Society Held Maintainable as Developer Is Not a Member Under Section 91, and Transaction Not Subject to Restrictions Under Sections 43, 44, or 45.

13 Jul 2016

The suit was filed by a partnership firm of developers, Maya Developers, against the Azad Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and its members, seeking s...

High Court

WRIT PETITION No. 4045 OF 2005

10 Dec 2013

The matter arises from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation, a local authority...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Delay Condonation in Mutation Entry Challenge. Court holds that delay in challenging mutation entry cannot be attributed to petitioner when authorities failed to comply with statutory duty under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

2 Mar 2023

The petitioners, Shankarrao Premaji Banarase and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur challenging the order dated 30/0...

18 19 20 21 22

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)