Search Results for "recovery of weapon"

270 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 270 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Sections 302 and 448 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sri Annappa Bhandary, was convicted by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Udupi (sitting at Kundapura) in S.C.No.29/2018 for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Appellants convicted under Section 302 read with 34 IPC for murder of Kambar Ali, relying on motive, last seen evidence, and recovery of weapons.

The case involves two appeals against a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, convicting the appellants under Section 302 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Shrinivas @ Shenu Shirsappa Ayyappa Swami and Vyankatesh @ Vyankati Narsimallu Sagar, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Chain of Circumstances Incomplete. Illicit Relationship Motive Insufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC When Last Seen Evidence and Recovery of Weapon Are Unreliable.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Rajendra Manohar Ghadigaonkar (respondent-accused) in Sessions Case No.16 of 2001 for the m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 set aside as prosecution failed to prove last seen theory and recovery of weapon beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal arises from the conviction of Rajendra Eknath Apugade and Arjun Vasant Falake (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) by the Additional Sessions Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Yuvraj Sampatrao Ghorpade, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of an unknown male under Section 302 IPC and for causing dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Eye Witness Testimony and Doubtful Recovery of Weapon. Bitter Gourd Creeper Dispute Leads to Life Imprisonment Reversed as Court Finds Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Ashok Chindha Birhade, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his neighbour Devidas, arising from a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances.

The appellant, Bhagwat Putalaya Pawar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur for the murder of his wife Parvati under Section 302 IP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Brutal Murder of 14-Year-Old Girl Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Life Sentence Confirmed Under Section 302 IPC. The court held that the chain of circumstances was complete and pointed unerringly to the guilt of the appellant, dismissing the appeal.

The appellant challenged the order dated 12.01.2017 of the High Court of Madras which upheld his conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC...