Search Results for "prison conditions"

577 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 577 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Extortion Case Due to Long Incarceration and Snail-Paced Trial. Delay in FIR and Lack of Evidence Weaken Prosecution Case Under Sections 364-A, 384, 385, 386, 387 IPC and Sections 3, 25 Arms Act.

The applicant, Mohammad Khalid Mukhtar Ahmed Shaikh, was accused No.1 in C.R. No.312 of 2020 registered with Bhiwandi City Police Station for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Anticipatory Bail Application Maintainable Despite Applicant's Custody in Another Crime. Section 438 CrPC Does Not Bar a Person Already Arrested in a Different Case from Seeking Pre-Arrest Bail.

The applicant, Amar S. Mulchandani, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC in connection with C.R.No.806 of 2019 registered at ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Receiver in Execution Under Section 51(d) CPC Despite Property Being Outside Territorial Jurisdiction. Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Appointment of Receiver as It Is an Independent Mode of Execution.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the decree-holders, Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and IIRF Holdings III Limited, in an execution applicatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Criminal Appeals Against Conviction in MCOCA Special Case No.1 of 2006. Accused-Appellants Were Convicted Under Various IPC and MCOCA Sections for Kidnapping for Ransom and Murder; Appeals Heard and Disposed by Common Judgment.

The case involved the abduction, ransom demand, and murder of Sagar Sahani, son of businessman Satinder Sahani. On 14 August 2005, Sagar was abducted ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Kidnapping, Rape, and Murder of Minor Girl Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory and Failure to Explain Under Section 106 Evidence Act Confirm Guilt Under Sections 366A, 376(2)(f), 302 IPC.

The appellant, Vijay Babasaheb Nanavare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No. 88 of 2006 for kidnapping a minor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Emergency Parole to Convict in POCSO and Rape Case for Father's Funeral. Rejection of Parole Solely on Ground of Heinous Offence Without Adverse Report Held Arbitrary Under Rule 19(1) of Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959.

The petitioner, Baburao Marotrao Dakhore, was convicted by the Learned Sessions Court, Hingoli for offences punishable under Section 376(2)(H)(I)(N) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind to Bail Conditions. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider that detenu was on bail and conditions ensured no prejudicial activity.

The petitioner, Intezar Umar Daraj Khan, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 31st October 2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mum...