Search Results for "packaging"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "packaging"

216 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 216 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revision Order — Revisional Court Erred in Entertaining Revision Under Section 438 BNSS Against Order Under Section 164 BNSS Without Notice. Order Under Section 164 BNSS Is Summary and Not Subject to Revision; Natural Justice Violated.

15 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Shri Noberto Paulo Sebastiao Fernandes, through his constituted attorney, filed a criminal writ petition before the High Court of Bomb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Action. Plaintiff's prior adoption and use of 'HOM' as acronym for 'House Of Mandarin' in restaurant services established, and defendant's adoption found not honest.

19 Dec 2025

The plaintiff, Indian Express and Commercial Ventures and Projects Private Limited, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Fu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — 'HAYWARDS 5000' v. 'COX 5000'. The court held that the Plaintiff's registered trademarks 'HAYWARDS 5000' and 'FIVE THOUSAND' were infringed by the Defendants' use of 'COX 5000', and the Defendants were restrained from using the impugned mark.

8 Dec 2025

The Plaintiff, Anheuser Busch Inbev India Ltd., filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, Jagpin Brewerise Limited & Ors., fro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sun Pharma's Trademark Infringement Suit Against Sanofi's METOSAN, Finding No Deceptive Similarity with METOSARTAN. The marks are phonetically and visually distinct, and the products differ in composition, negating likelihood of confusion.

24 Oct 2016

The plaintiff, Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against The Madras Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi Indi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit for Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off Against Defendants Over 'SUNCONTROL' Mark. The Court held that 'SUNCONTROL' is descriptive and not distinctive, and that the plaintiff failed to establish secondary meaning or likelihood of confusion.

12 Jul 2016

The plaintiff, Garware Polyester Limited, filed a suit for trade mark infringement and passing off against 3M Company and 3M India Limited, alleging t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Due to Suppression of Material Facts. Plaintiff's Conduct of Suppressing Prior User and Earlier Litigation Disentitles It to Equitable Relief Under Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Copyright Act, 1957.

29 Sep 2015

The suit was filed by ITC Limited against NTC Industries Ltd. for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off in relation to cigarettes and t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Ex Parte Decree in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Plaintiff's Registered Mark 'ZITA' Infringed by Defendants' Identical Mark. Court holds that registration of assignment with Trademarks Registry is not a prerequisite for filing suit; plaintiff's title to mark established through assignment deeds.

30 Jun 2015

The plaintiff, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit against G.R.A.F. Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. and Valence Health Care for infringement of its reg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Distributorship Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Profits for Period Without Written Agreement. The court held that the arbitrator's finding that no implied contract existed for the period 14th June 2006 to 31st March 2007 was not perverse or against public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Diversey India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Imposed on Public Sector Oil Company for Alleged Legal Metrology Violation — Lack of Mens Rea and Procedural Irregularities. Show Cause Notice Must Specify Exact Violation Under Section 50 of Legal Metrology Act, 2009.

31 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, a public sector oil company, challenged an order dated 4/9/2013 passed by the Secretary, Legal Metrolo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Central Excise Classification Disputes — Laminated Tubes and Printed Cartons Classified as Printed Matter Under Chapter 49. The court held that no substantial question of law arose as the classification was a question of fact determined by the Tribunal based on evidence.

30 Nov -0001

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa, filed multiple appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against the common order of the Cus...

18 19 20 21 22

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)