Search Results for "narrow interpretation"

1033 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1033 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement and Counter Claim in Suit Filed Before 2002 CPC Amendment. Order 6 Rule 17 as amended by 2002 Amendment Act does not apply to suits instituted before 1.7.2002.

The petitioner, Sumita Pradipkumar Dixit, challenged an order dated 29.8.2009 passed by the trial court in RC Suit No. 187/1999, which rejected her ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Cancellation Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Registration Cancelled Without Proper Notice and Opportunity of Hearing, Set Aside with Restoration.

The petitioner, Rawman Metal & Alloys, a proprietorship concern, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Interprets MEPS Act, 1977 and Rules, 1981 on Retired Awardee Teacher as Inquiry Committee Member. Conflict Between Division Bench Judgments on Whether Retired Teacher Can Be a Member Referred to Larger Bench for Authoritative Pronouncement.

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict between two Division Bench judgments on the interpretation of Rule 36(2)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Taxation of Alleged Shortfall in Share Premium Under Transfer Pricing Provisions. The Dispute Centers on Whether Chapter X of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Can Apply When No Actual Income Arises from the International Transaction.

The petitioner, Vodafone India Services Pvt. Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of a non-resident holding company, issued 2,89,224 equity shares at a pre...