Search Results for "medical evidence contradiction"

551 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 551 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Consent. Allegations under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Atrocity Act fail as victim's testimony is unreliable and medical evidence does not support prosecution case.

The State of Gujarat filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging the judgment and order dated 10.01....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Delay in FIR Led to Benefit of Doubt for Accused Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and SC/ST Act.

The State of Gujarat filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging the judgment and order dated 10.01....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Story. Conviction Under Section 376(g) IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Does Not Support Rape and Victim's Testimony is Full of Omissions.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Section 376(g) IPC. The appellants, Parmeshwar and Vitthal, were convicted by the trial court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Age Below 18 Years and Relied on Contradictory Testimony.

The appellant, Asif s/o Jakir Pathan, was convicted by the Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Special Case (POCSO) No.173 of 2016 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping, Rape, and Murder of Minor — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Circumstantial evidence including last seen theory, recovery of body, and DNA evidence held sufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Deepak Kumar Ganesh Rai Manto, was convicted by the Children's Court at Goa for kidnapping, rape, and murder of a minor girl, and for d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Assault on Public Servant in ST Stand Incident. Accused Convicted Under Sections 323, 332, 353 IPC for Assaulting Bus Conductor During Duty Hours.

The revision application was filed by the son of the original accused, Balasaheb Nivrutti Jagtap, who died during the pendency of the criminal appeal....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Hostile Witness. Conviction Under Sections 365, 366, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shaikh Mahemood Sk. Osman, was convicted by the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No.35 of 1997 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Doubtful Evidence. Conviction under Section 307 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Salimoddin Gulam Dastagir Shaikh and Gulam Dastagir Bahavoddin Shaikh, were convicted by the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Cruelty in Bride Burning Case — Dying Declaration Recorded by Police Constable Held Admissible. The court found the dying declaration reliable and corroborated, affirming life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Datta s/o Kisan Gaikwad, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Omerga in Sessions Case No. 23 of 2005 for the murder of his w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Inconsistencies in Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Balya @ Baliram Shivram More, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, ...