High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench Hears Group of Writ Petitions by University Employees. No adjudicative details available in the provided text.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "ignoring findings"
1407 result(s) found
Found 1407 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Concessionaire in Airport Metro Express Line Dispute. The court held that the Delhi High Court's interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was unjustified, as the Arbitral Tribunal's findings on defects and material breach in the concession agreement were based on evidence and within its jurisdiction.
9 Sep 2021The Supreme Court of India addressed civil appeals arising from a dispute between Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. (DAMEPL), the appellant and co...
- 327
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Appellants in IPC Murder Case — Conviction Under Sections 302/149 and 307/149 Upheld. Court Rejects Self-Defence and Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, Affirming Concurrent Findings of Trial and High Courts.
21 Jul 2026The Supreme Court dismissed three criminal appeals filed by the convicted accused (Om Pal, Narendra, Ranvir, Dharamvir; appeal of Inchha Ram abated) a...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title. Court holds that admission of storage of rubble by defendants does not negate plaintiffs' possession of eastern side of suit property.
18 Feb 2025The second appeal was filed by original defendant nos. 1 and 2 challenging concurrent judgments and decrees granting declaration of title and injuncti...
- 406
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Property Tax Levy by Panvel Municipal Corporation on Kharghar Node. Petitioners Lacked Locus Standi and Failed to Exhaust Statutory Remedy of Appeal Under Section 406 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.
6 Apr 2023The petitioners, Kharghar Co-op. Housing Societies Federation and an individual resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...
- 82
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Appeal on Taxability of Capital Gains from Transfer of Shares of a Cayman Islands Company Holding Indian Telecom Assets. The core issue involves whether the offshore transaction is liable to capital gains tax in India under the Income Tax Act, 1961, given that the company's value is derived from Indian telecom assets.
1 Aug 2026The matter concerned a tax dispute between Vodafone International Holdings BV (VIH), a Netherlands resident company, and the Indian Revenue authoritie...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. The court held that the appellant-defendant failed to prove exclusive title by adverse possession or ouster, and the suit for partition was not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
8 Jun 2026The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendant no. 2 (since deceased, represented by his legal heirs) against the judgment and decr...
- 321
High Court
Court Rules in Favor of Petitioner, Overturns Minister's Decision on Ashram School Management . Legal jurisdiction and procedural adherence scrutinized in Writ Petition, emphasizing the roles of Minister and Secretary in school management decisions.
28 Jun 2024This document is a legal judgment from a Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner challenged an order passed...
- 354
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Daily Wage Employee Against Municipal Council for Unfair Labour Practice. Reinstatement with Back Wages Granted as Termination Without Notice and Without Following Seniority Under Section 25G of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.
30 Nov 2006The petitioner, Sunil Sherekar, was employed as a Junior Engineer on daily wages with the Nagar Parishad, Yavatmal, from 15-11-1991. The regular Junio...
- 81
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge to Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 7.39 Crore with Interest. Limitation plea rejected as claim was within time; quantification not perverse.
2 Apr 2026The judgment concerns a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...
- 150
