Search Results for "firm name"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "firm name"

2361 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2361 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Quashing of Cheque Dishonour Complaint for Procedural Irregularities. Taking Cognizance After Recording Sworn Statement and Validity of Power of Attorney Holder's Complaint Examined Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

4 Jul 2022

The High Court of Karnataka heard writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking quashing of criminal proceedings in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Suit — Upholds Refusal to Strike Out Defence Under Order 8 Rule 10 CPC for Failure to File Written Statement Within 90 Days. The court held that the power to strike out defence is discretionary and not automatic, and that non-disclosure of defence under Order 6A Rule 3 CPC does not justify striking out.

21 Dec 2017

The present appeals arise from a suit filed in 1987 by Behram Nowrosji Gamadia and Jehangir Dhan Mistri (original plaintiffs) against several defendan...

High Court

High Court Upholds Acquittal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case Due to Failure to Prove Legal Enforceability of Debt. The Court Found That Presumption Under Section 139 Did Not Extend to Legal Liability as Complainant Could Not Prove Partnership Profits Through Profit and Loss Account or Balance Sheet.

17 Jan 2019

This was a criminal appeal filed by the complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the judgment of acquittal passed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Over Counter-Claim in Partnership Dispute. Allegations of fraud in counter-claim do not render it non-arbitrable unless serious and complex, under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Apr 2014

The case involves two arbitration petitions filed by Rekha Agarwal and Sunil Agarwal challenging an order of a Sole Arbitrator under Section 16 of the...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Numerous Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notifications and Demands. Petitioners Contend That the Notifications under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 are Ultra Vires the Constitution and Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheating Case Due to Purely Civil Nature of Dispute — Non-Payment of Dues Does Not Attract Criminal Breach of Trust Under Section 406 IPC.

3 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. and its office bearers against the order of the Allahabad High Court which h...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Cheque Dishonour Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act — Amendment Sought to Correct Date of Cheque Presentation Does Not Change Nature of Complaint. The court upheld the Magistrate's order allowing amendment to correct typographical error in date of cheque presentation, holding that no prejudice was caused to the accused.

28 Apr 2023

The case involves a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging an order dated 20.04.2013 passed by th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Termination of Arbitral Proceedings and Constitute New Arbitral Tribunal Under Sections 9 and 14 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Delay Condoned Due to Sufficient Cause Shown by Legal Heirs of Deceased Partner.

12 Aug 2015

The petitioners, Neeta Lalit Sanghavi and Hemanshu Lalit Sanghavi, are the legal heirs of the deceased partner, Lalitkumar Vanmalidas Sanghavi. They f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Oral Agreement for Sale of Basement Premises. Agreement Not Proved and Relief Barred by Limitation and Doctrine of Part Performance.

4 Feb 2005

The plaintiffs, a partnership firm, filed a suit for specific performance of an oral agreement dated 30.11.1977 for the purchase of a basement-cum-god...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Refers Question of Law on Allowability of Expenditure under Section 40(a)(i) and Section 172 of Income Tax Act to Larger Bench. Disagreement with earlier Division Bench decision in CIT v. Orient (Goa) Pvt. Ltd. leads to referral on whether payer's non-resident status required for invoking proviso to Section 172.

5 Feb 2016

Background: The case concerns income tax appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income ...

18 19 20 21 22

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)