Search Results for "draft notification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "draft notification"

1021 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1021 result(s)

High Court

Writ Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India Against the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal's Order Dated 2.3.2010 Dismissing the Applicants' Claims in Applications No.1212-1250/2010. The Petitioners Sought Quashing of the Tribunal's Order and Alleged Illegality in the Proceedings Before the Tribunal.

23 Sep 2014

...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Hears Builder's Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Partly Quashing Stop Construction Notice and Directing Objections Under KIAD Act. The Full Bench Reserves Judgment on 06-02-2014, but the Final Decision is Not Available in the Provided Incomplete Text.

11 Apr 2014

The case involves writ appeals filed by M/s Century Central, a registered partnership firm, challenging the order dated 02/07/2013 passed by a learned...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Premium and Interest Demands for Leasehold Land Conversion in Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's demand for premium and interest under Development Charges Rules and lease terms upheld as valid and not arbitrary.

3 May 2023

The petitioners, Shelton Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, Neelkanth Infratech Co., and M/s. Juhi Habitat Pvt. Ltd., were lessees of plots in Navi Mumbai under ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Order in Transport Department Recruitment Dispute. The Petitions Seek to Quash the Tribunal's Order on Grounds of Illegality.

23 Sep 2014

This batch of writ petitions arose from proceedings before the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal (KAT). The petitioners, numerous individuals, challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Delay in Issuance of Final Judgment Under Section 6 of Maharashtra Private Forest (Acquisition) Act, 1975 — Directs Collector to Issue Judgment Without Requiring Prior Approval Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. The court held that the Collector's insistence on prior approval under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 was erroneous as the lands had already vested under the state acquisition law, and the issuance of the final judgment was a ministerial act.

15 Mar 2022

The petitioners, Sankalp Resorts Private Limited and Emerald Acres Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a direc...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.2720 OF 2013

1 Oct 2014

The writ petitions were filed by municipal employee unions and individuals challenging the legality and constitutional validity of provisions of the B...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order in Challenge to Ward Reservation Notification Under Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. Petitioners contended that reservation for General Women for three consecutive terms and failure to follow rotation policy violated Section 7 of the Act and Article 243T of the Constitution.

9 Aug 2018

These writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the final notification dated 19.07.2018 issued by ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging State Transport Department's Order. Petitioners Assail Government Decision Dated 05.08.2015 on Grounds of Illegality Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules.

3 May 2017

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.

15 Jun 2026

The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Disposes PIL Seeking Implementation of Earlier Directions on Demarcation of High Tide Line and CRZ Compliance for Beachfront Hotel. Court Holds That Authorities Must Determine if Construction Falls Within Prohibited Zone Under CRZ Notification, 1991.

24 Aug 2018

The Goa Foundation, a public interest organization, filed PIL Writ Petition No. 26 of 2017 before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, alleging that the G...

18 19 20 21 22

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)