KAHC010137632012_1
23 Feb 2023...
Search Results for "different establishments"
681 result(s) found
Found 681 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses University's Writ Petitions Challenging Industrial Court's Interim Relief Orders in Service Disputes. Held that Industrial Court has jurisdiction to grant interim relief under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.
30 Nov -0001The Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University and its Vice-Chancellor filed four writ petitions (WP Nos. 2966/2011, 2967/2011, 2968/2011, 2969/20...
- 131
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demand Notices Under Mathadi Act — Unprotected Worker Defined as Manual Worker in Scheduled Employment. Direct Employment Does Not Exclude Coverage Under Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969.
3 Mar 2006The Bombay High Court addressed two writ petitions challenging demand notices issued under the Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Re...
- 124
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Industrial Dispute Reference Under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Government's Satisfaction for Reference Not Open to Judicial Review on Merits.
17 Feb 2023The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. and Shangrila Food Products Ltd. challenging the order of reference ma...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Labour Court Order in Industrial Dispute — Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication on Merits. Failure to Provide Reasoned Decision and Non-Consideration of Evidence Constitutes Violation of Principles of Natural Justice.
9 Apr 2026The petitioner, GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Limited, challenged an order of the Labour Court, Nashik, dated 30 November 2024, which dismissed the ...
- 155
High Court
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Food Safety Act Case — Lack of Vicarious Liability. Directors cannot be held liable under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 without specific averments of their role in the offence.
5 Mar 2024The petitioners, including a company and its erstwhile directors, challenged an order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, which dismissed their ...
- 69
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Closure Order Against Hospital in KPME Act Case — Minister's Communication Lacked Statutory Authority. Writ Petition Allowed as Appellate Authority Failed to Consider Petitioner's Explanation and Violated Principles of Natural Justice Under Karnataka Private Medical Establishments Act, 2007.
25 May 2023The petitioner, Gurushree High-Tech Multi Speciality Hospital, challenged a closure order dated 19.12.2022 passed by the Appellate Authority (Commissi...
- 90
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Food Adulteration Case — Lack of Vicarious Liability Under Section 10 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. Directors Not In Charge of Day-to-Day Business at Relevant Time Cannot Be Prosecuted Without Specific Allegations of Consent or Neglect.
30 Nov -0001The judgment pertains to two criminal writ petitions filed by directors and a company against criminal proceedings initiated under the Prevention of F...
- 145
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Leave India Notice and Directs Fresh Consideration of Visa Conversion Application. Non-Compliance with High Court's Orders and Lack of Personal Hearing Lead to Setting Aside of Deportation Order.
6 Sep 2013The petitioner, an Iranian national, had been residing in Pune, India, on an X visa (residence visa) which was extended up to 31 October 2011. He soug...
- 10
