Search Results for "detention order quashed"

1115 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1115 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. Detenu's Right to Liberty Upheld as Detaining Authority Did Not Apply Mind to Necessity of Detention Over Criminal Prosecution.

The petitioner, Omkar Rajendra Bhosle, challenged a preventive detention order dated 3rd March 2025 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Pune City, u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind to Bail Grant. Failure to Consider Petitioner's Release on Bail in Sessions Case No.79/2022 Rendered Detention Order Invalid.

The petitioner, Vijay Baburao Avhad, challenged the detention order dated 19.05.2022 passed by the District Magistrate, Ahmednagar under Section 3(2) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions for Premature Release of Life Convicts in NDPS Act Cases — Held That Detention Beyond 14 Years Without Consideration of Remission Is Illegal. The court directed the state to consider premature release under the remission policy dated 10.02.2010 and Section 433A CrPC.

The petitioners, Bandu Shivaji More, Prashant Krushandev Jadhav, and Satyawan Mahadev Suryavanshi, were convicted for offences under the Narcotic Drug...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Orders.

The petitioner, Shailesh Dnyaneshwar Kedar, challenged a detention order dated 23 November 2014 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Preventive Detention Case Due to Vague and Non-Existent Grounds. Detention Order Quashed as Grounds Failed to Provide Adequate Particulars for Representation, Rendering the Detention Illegal Under Sections 3 and 4 of Preventive Detention Act, 1950.

The petitioner was detained under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, on allegations of black-marketing essential commodities. He challenged the deten...