Bombay High Court Reserved Judgment in Civil Writ Petition Relating to Urban Development and Town Planning. Petitioners Filed Against State and Municipal Corporation Challenging Administrative Decisions.
21 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "deemed acquisition lapsed"
353 result(s) found
Found 353 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court Order Declaring Proceedings Lapsed. Acquisition Upheld as Physical Possession Taken and Land Utilized for Public Purpose, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation, Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
24 Feb 2023The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the High Court of Delhi allowed a writ petition, declaring that acquisition proceedings under the...
- 217
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Delhi Development Authority's Appeal Against Declaration of Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Physical Possession Taken Through Punchnama Proceedings Constitutes Sufficient Compliance, Preventing Deemed Lapse Despite Non-Payment of Compensation as Per Indore Development Authority Precedent.
24 Feb 2023The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the Delhi Development Authority challenging the Delhi High Court's judgment that declared land acquisition procee...
- 195
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Land Acquisition Collector's Appeal Against High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as Possession Was Partially Taken and Interim Period Excluded, Applying Indore Development Authority Over Pune Municipal Corporation.
24 Feb 2023The dispute involved an appeal against a High Court order that declared land acquisition proceedings lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair C...
- 202
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Did Not Lapse as Compensation Was Deposited and Possession Was Taken Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Requires Both Non-Payment and Non-Possession.
20 Jan 2023The dispute arose from a land acquisition initiated in 1964 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with an award declared in 1967. The Delhi Developmen...
- 255
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, as Possession Was Taken, Satisfying One of the Twin Conditions for Non-Lapse.
20 Jan 2023The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, concerning specific land. The Government of NCT of...
- 272
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Government of NCT of Delhi's Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — High Court's Declaration of Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Set Aside Due to Pendency of Proceedings Initiated by Landowners. The Court held that when possession could not be taken due to court orders obtained by landowners, the period of interim orders is excluded in computing five years for lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
2 Dec 2022The Government of NCT of Delhi appealed against the High Court of Delhi's judgment in Writ Petition (C) No. 2709 of 2015, which declared that land acq...
- 215
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act – Failure to Acquire Within Ten Years. Reservation of land for public purpose lapses as acquiring body failed to take steps within prescribed period under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
29 Nov 2017The petitioners, co-owners of ancestral land in Chehedi village within Nashik Municipal Corporation limits, filed a writ petition seeking a declaratio...
- 184
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapsing of Reservation Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Statutory Period. Land reserved for postal staff quarters since 1979 becomes free from reservation after notice under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966.
21 Aug 2015The petitioner, Balkrishna Jagannath Lad, owned land bearing survey No. 103/12/1D/1A at Pandharpur within the limits of Pandharpur Municipal Council. ...
- 115
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Dereservation of Land Under MRTP Act — Reservation Lapses Due to Non-Acquisition Within Six Months of Purchase Notice. The court held that mere passing of a resolution for acquisition does not constitute steps for acquisition under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
30 Jun 2010The petitioner, Madanlal Lalchand Jain, owned land bearing S.No. 38/3 at Nandurbar. The Assistant Director of Town Planning published a draft developm...
- 20
