Search Results for "consumer protection"

685 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 685 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Second Appeals in RERA Delayed Possession Matter. Builder Challenges Appellate Tribunal's Direction to Pay Interest at 10.05% p.a. from February 2014.

These Second Appeals were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay by Runwal Constructions, a registered partnership firm, challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows AERA's Appeal Against TDSAT Orders Under Section 31 of AERA Act — Tariff Determination Held to Be Regulatory, Not Adjudicatory, Function. Regulatory Authority Can Challenge Appellate Tribunal's Decisions on Questions of Law.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Author...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in Consumer Protection Case Due to Absence of Deficiency in Service. Consumer Forums Cannot Adjudicate Highly Disputed Factual Issues or Allegations of Fraud Between Company Directors as Proceedings Are Summary in Nature Under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the Managing Director of D-Cube Constructions (P) Ltd. against City Union Bank Limited, alleging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Consumer Complaint, Reducing Compensation for Deficiency in Hair Styling Services. Deficiency in Service Upheld as Factual Finding, but Compensation of Rs.2 Crores Set Aside as Excessive and Unsupported by Evidence Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeal arose from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in a consumer complaint filed by the respondent against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Consumer Complaint Against Builder for Refund of Consideration Due to Premature Filing and Lack of Deficiency Proof. Complaint Filed Before Expiry of Contractual Grace Period Under Allotment Terms, and Appellants Failed to Establish Incomplete Work or Delay in Possession Offer.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the appellants against the respondent-company, a builder, alleging deficiency in service due to d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes State Order on Solvent Licensing for Repugnancy with Central Order. Maharashtra Solvent Raffinate and Slop (Licensing) Order 2007 struck down as ultra vires the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 due to conflict with Central Order of 2000.

The Petitioner, Indian Small Scale Paint Association Society, challenged the Maharashtra Solvent Raffinate and Slop (Licensing) Order 2007 as being re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Consumer Appeal Dismissed in Default Due to Advocate's Absence. State Commission Lacks Power to Recall DID Order; High Court Exercises Writ Jurisdiction to Set Aside Order and Restore Appeal for Fresh Hearing on Merits.

The petitioner, Arun Modale, had filed a First Appeal No. 481/2009 before the Maharashtra State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (State Commissio...