Search Results for "collusive"

342 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 342 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction in Favor of Tenant in Land Dispute with Agricultural Corporation. The court restored the trial court's interim injunction protecting the petitioner's possession based on prima facie tenancy rights and balance of convenience.

The petitioner, Baliram Dagadu Mundfane, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Writ Petition, Directs Execution of Section 14 SARFAESI Order Despite Pending Civil Suit. Executive Magistrate Cannot Refuse Possession on Ground of Civil Suit; Role Under Section 14 is Ministerial.

The Petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, a banking company, had sanctioned a housing loan to Dipak Digambar Naik and Aruna Naik (co-borrowers) in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Against Restoration of Possession in Execution Proceedings — Compromise Decree Set Aside Without Notice to Decree Holder Violates Natural Justice. Order XXI Rule 99 CPC Application Cannot Be Decided Without Hearing the Decree Holder.

The petitioner, Smt. Leelavathi, filed a civil revision petition under Section 18 of the Karnataka Small Causes Courts Act, 1964, challenging an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Permission to Open New Law College Under Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016. State Government's Discretion Under Section 109(3)(d) Upheld as Absolute; Annual Plan Need Not Be Strictly Within Perspective Plan.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging a Government Resolution dated 15.06.2023 granting permission to respondent No.4 to open...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Regular First Appeals in Property Suit — Decree of Trial Court Set Aside for Non-Joinder of Necessary Parties. Suit for Partition and Separate Possession Held Not Maintainable Without Impleading All Co-Sharers Under Order 1 Rule 9 of CPC, 1908.

The judgment pertains to two Regular First Appeals filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Trial and Appellate Courts. Agreement to Sell Dated 1st October 1974 Proved; Appellant as Subsequent Purchaser Not Protected Under Section 19(b) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The case involves a second appeal filed by Sadashiv Ramchandra Arve (original defendant no.3) against the judgment and decree dated 2nd December 1992 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Family Court Appeal in Nullity of Marriage Case Based on Admission of Non-Consummation. Court holds that admission of non-consummation of marriage in written statement warrants decree of nullity under Section 12(1)(a) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, irrespective of who is at fault.

The appellant, Ameya Kulkarni, and the respondent, Isha Kulkarni, were married on 13.03.2023 as per Hindu rites. The marriage was not consummated, and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings Upheld. Sale Deed Cancelled to Extent of Plaintiff's 1/4th Share as Purchaser Not a Bonafide Transferee Without Notice.

The present second appeal was filed by the original defendant No.4, Vikrant s/o Vilasrao Patil (since deceased, through legal heirs), challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Execution Objection Case — Upholds Summary Rejection of Objection Petition Under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC. Executing Court Not Required to Adjudicate Title When Objection is Frivolous and Collusive.

The appellant, Kamal W/o Vishwanath Jadhav, filed a second appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 11.09.2025 passed by the first appellate C...