Search Results for "chamber"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "chamber"

1484 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1484 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows NAFED's Chamber Summons for Return of Rs. 32 Crore Deposited in Suit, Dismisses Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion for Withdrawal. Court holds that NAFED is entitled to refund of deposit made under mistaken belief of liability, and plaintiffs cannot claim the amount as they have no decree or order in their favor.

13 Feb 2024

The judgment arises out of three applications in Suit No. 121 of 2014 pending before the Bombay High Court. The plaintiffs, L.J. Tanna Enterprises Pvt...

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses Interim Applications in Redevelopment Contract Dispute Between Developer and Partner. The Court Examines Injunctions Against Termination and Alienation of Property Under the Specific Relief Act.

27 Jun 2013

The plaintiff, Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913, filed Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Possessors to Pay Decretal Amount to Avoid Auction in Execution Proceedings. Decree Holder Cannot Insist on Auction When Possessor Willing to Satisfy Decree Under Order 21 Rules 64 and 83 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

6 Jun 2011

The petitioners, Lalit Malick, Shyam Malick, and Madhu Bhatti, filed a writ petition challenging the execution proceedings of a decree passed in Comme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses Impleadment of Subsequent Purchasers in Suit for Specific Performance — Examines Section 19, Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Precedents on Necessary Parties. Court Analyzes Whether Persons Claiming Under Vendor Are Necessary Parties Under Order I Rule 10, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Section 19 of Specific Relief Act.

9 Apr 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing a Chamber Summons for amendment of the plaint in a suit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Owner's Impleadment in Licensee's Suit Against Municipal Corporation for Demolition. Owner is a necessary party under Order I Rule 10 CPC as the suit directly affects the owner's right to property and the owner has a right to be heard before any order affecting his property is passed.

29 Nov 2023

The case involves a reference to a larger bench of the Bombay High Court to resolve a conflict of views among single judges regarding whether the owne...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Attachment Order in Arbitration Under Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 — Arbitrator Lacks Power to Attach Non-Mortgaged Property Before Award. The court held that Section 96 of the Act must be read with Section 84, limiting attachment to property mortgaged to the society.

24 Aug 2005

The Saraswat Co-operative Bank Ltd. initiated arbitration proceedings under Section 84 of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 against M/s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Division Bench Admitted and Heard Commercial Arbitration Appeal Challenging Single Judge's Refusal to Enforce Three Foreign Arbitral Awards Under Section 50 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Appeal Involves Enforcement Against Non-Signatory Related Companies and Alleged Asset Diversion Through Demerger Schemes to Defeat Execution of ICC London Awards Totaling Over USD 20 Million.

30 Dec 2025

The appeal originated from a dispute between Imax Corporation (appellant) and E-City Entertainment (I) Pvt. Ltd. (first respondent) arising from a Mas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Contempt Petition for Lack of Prima Facie Case. Allegations of Creating Third-Party Rights and Obtaining Consent Decree Without Disclosing Pending Proceedings Do Not Constitute Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

27 Apr 2005

The case involves a criminal contempt petition filed by Dr. Ramesh D. Pandit and another (original plaintiffs) against Smt. Janabai and others (origin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Discovery in Specific Performance Suit — Discovery Sought After Issues Settled and Evidence Led, Not Permitted Under CPC Order XI Rule 1A

20 Mar 2014

The appeal arises from a suit filed by NTPC Limited (respondent-plaintiff) in December 2005 seeking specific performance of a contract for supply of 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Execution of Consent Decree in Commercial Suit — Decree Not Null and Void Despite Alleged Non-Compliance with Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. Court Holds That a Consent Decree Can Be Executed Even If It Contains Terms Beyond the Suit, Provided Parties Freely Consented.

20 Dec 2018

The case arises from a commercial suit (Suit No. 119 of 2016) filed by Mahesh P. Raheja, Preeti P. Raheja, and Shakuntala P. Raheja (Respondent Nos. 1...

18 19 20 21 22

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)