Search Results for "capital asset"

575 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 575 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considers batch of income tax appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging ITAT orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05. Assessee and Revenue both seek to set aside the ITAT decisions and frame substantial questions of law.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with a batch of income tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition; Sets Aside Order of Chief Commissioner of Income Tax Rejecting Condonation of Delay Under Section 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act. Compensation for Land Acquisition Exempt under RFCTLARR Act Not Considered by Revenue; Matter Remanded for Fresh Decision.

The petitioner, the widow of the deceased assessee, sought condonation of delay in filing the income tax return for the assessment year 2022-23. Her h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case Under Section 43B Explanation 3C. Interest Converted into Debentures Not Deemed Actually Paid as Per Retrospective Amendment, Disallowing Deduction Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The dispute arose from an appeal by M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. against the Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-III, concerning the interpretation of Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Reserves Judgment in Revenue Appeals Concerning Tax Exemption on Land Acquisition Compensation. The Bench Considers if Section 96 of the 2013 Act Applies to Acquisitions under the Karnataka Highways Act.

The Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Bengaluru, filed five intra-court writ appeals under section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement in Company Petition for Revival of Sick Pharmaceutical Company. Scheme under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956, Approved Involving Settlement of Secured Creditors' Dues through Cash and Securities.

The Pharmaceutical Products of India Limited (PPIL), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed two company petitions under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition of Auction Purchaser Against Bank for Delivery of Possession Under SARFAESI Act. Bank's Failure to Hand Over Vacant Possession After Sale Confirmation Constitutes Dereliction of Duty Enforceable Under Article 226.

The petitioner, Vijayanand Srinivasan, an auction purchaser, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Judgment in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Non-Compliance and Limitation. Bank's Auction Sale Upheld as Borrower's Challenge Was Time-Barred and Requests Did Not Trigger Statutory Obligations Under Section 13(3A) of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The dispute arose from proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SAR...