Search Results for "balance of convenience"

587 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 587 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal Seeking Injunction Against Demolition — Tenant Refusing to Vacate Despite Offer of Market Compensation. Court Held That Tenant Cannot Hold Development to Ransom and Must Accept Compensation or Face Eviction.

The appellant, Smt. Esther Manickam, was a tenant in Flat No.A2, Ground floor, Ruia Building, Juhu, Mumbai, paying rent less than Rs.50 per month. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Cricket Association Against Injunction Restraining Expulsion of Member. Expulsion Decision Violated Natural Justice as No Opportunity of Hearing Was Given Before Imposing Five-Year Ban.

The case involves an appeal by the Mumbai Cricket Association (MCA) against an order dated 7 September 2013 passed by the City Civil Court, Greater Mu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Injunction Set Aside Due to Vague Pleadings and Lack of Prima Facie Case. The court held that without proper proof of trademark ownership and clear pleadings, an interim injunction cannot be granted under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The case involves an appeal against an interim injunction granted by the Principal District Judge, Pune, restraining the appellants from using the tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against Injunction in Property Dispute. Court upholds trial court's finding that plaintiffs proved prior possession and better title, affirming temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The case involves an appeal from order (AO-37-2008) and a cross objection (XOB-7-2009) arising out of a civil suit for permanent injunction and declar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Notice of Motion for Interim Relief in Specific Performance Suit Due to Non-Compliance with Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC. Plaintiffs Failed to Make Out Prima Facie Case for Appointment of Receiver or Injunction.

The plaintiffs, M/s. Pride Associates and others, filed a suit for specific performance of an Agreement for Sale dated 4th June 2005 for a property in...