Search Results for "arrest panchnama"

715 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 715 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Sheetal Anil Berlekar and Babasaheb Gangaram Daingade, were convicted by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur for the murder of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal, Upholds Murder Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Single Blow with Iron Rod on Head Causing Depressed Fracture Amounts to Murder Under Section 302 IPC as Intention to Cause Death is Inferable.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, a truck driver, for the murder of his cleaner, Mahavir Waghmare. The prosecution case rested en...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Right of Private Defence and Lack of Common Intention. The court held that the deceased was the aggressor and the appellants acted in self-defence, and the prosecution failed to prove common intention under Section 34 IPC.

The appellants, Nandlal, Parshuram, and Sanjay Baviskar, were convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of Lakhichand under Section 302 read with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for killing wife by strangulation and setting her on fire, relying on last seen theory, motive, and recovery of incriminating articles.

The appellant, Harish Ramesh Pulekar, was convicted by the I/c Adhoc District Judge-I, Thane in Sessions Case No.382 of 2006 for the murder of his wif...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for strangulation of wife set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nilesh Laxmikant Vyas, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad, for the murder of his wife, Neha @ Pooja, under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Lacks Completeness and Chain of Events.

The judgment arises from two criminal appeals filed by the appellants against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal in Sessions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Selvaraj Johnson Rodrigo, was convicted by the Special Judge, Mumbai, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sanjay s/o Ishwar Bhanushali, was convicted by the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) for Greater Mumbai for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Narhari Suryawanshi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedpur, for the murder of his nephew Laxman under Section 302 IP...