Search Results for "armed assault"

778 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 778 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Anjalappa and Ashok, were convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi in S.C. No.322/2012 for the murder of a person unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to a village rivalry between two factions that led to the death of one person. The prosecution arrested 18 persons from the rival gr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 144, 148, 302 r/w 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Sudhakar on 19.08.2011. The informant Devidas (PW1) had a dispute with accused nos. 1, 4, and 5 over a field taken ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and lacked corroboration.

The appellants, original accused Nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangamner, for the murder of Santu Jayram Ranmale and o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302, 506 read with 149 IPC and other charges set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of six respondents (Maruti Budhaji Bhopi, Santosh Budhaji Bhopi, Ramesh Narayan Bhopi, Ashok N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Dnyanoba Baburao Pandhare and Lilawatibai Pandhare, were convicted by the trial court under Sections 302, 323, 324 read with 34 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Material Contradictions and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 143, 144, 147, 148, 506 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the judgment and order dated 20 August 2005 passed by the 1st Ad-Hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Confirms Death Sentence and Dismisses Appeals in Triple Murder Case. Murder Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Upheld Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a Criminal Confirmation Case along with three criminal appeals arising from the judgment a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Doubtful Identification and Contradictory Evidence. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 302, 325 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case arises from a criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 30th May 1991 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, in Sess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Army Officer in POCSO Case. Judicial Review under Article 226 Limited to Jurisdictional Error; No Re-appreciation of Evidence.

The petitioner, a retired Lieutenant Colonel in the Indian Army, was convicted by a General Court Martial (GCM) under Section 69 of the Army Act, 1950...