Search Results for "Trade Well"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Trade Well"

3265 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3265 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit — Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Swisskem Healthcare & Anr. — 'PANDERM' and 'POLYDERM+' Held Deceptively Similar. The Court held that the marks are structurally and phonetically similar, and the Defendant's use is likely to cause confusion, especially in medicinal products where a high degree of care is expected.

2 Jul 2019

The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the Defendants, Swisskem Healthcare and ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Registration of 'DROPOVIT' Trade Mark in Vitamin Preparation Dispute; Holds No Deceptive Similarity with 'PROTOVIT'. Terminal Syllable 'VIT' Held Common to Trade and Descriptive, and Pharmaceutical Products Sold on Prescription Reduce Likelihood of Confusion under Sections 12(1) and 9(1) of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

8 Sep 1969

The dispute involved a trade mark rectification proceeding under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958, between F. Hoffmann-La Roche & Co. Ltd., a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Deceptive Similarity Between STIMULIV and STIMULET for Different Pharmaceutical Products. The court held that the mark 'STIMULET' used for an allopathic breast cancer drug does not infringe the registered mark 'STIMULIV' used for Ayurvedic liver medicines due to differences in nature, trade channels, and customers under Section 29(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

20 Jan 2023

The case involves a trademark infringement and passing off dispute between two pharmaceutical companies. The appellant, Corona Remedies Private Limite...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court of India Decides Revenue Appeal Against Tribunal's Order on Excise Valuation of Fiat Cars. Assessee's Price Below Cost Held as Normal Price Under Section 4(1)(a) by Tribunal, Revenue Challenges on Ground That Price Did Not Reflect Manufacturing Cost and Profit.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute concerned the valuation of Fiat Uno model cars for central excise duty under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The assessee, M/s ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses/Quashes? Not known. Petitions by Agricultural University challenging trade union complaints on behalf of retired employees regarding pension dues allegedly beyond limitation.

25 Feb 2016

The matter comprises a batch of writ petitions filed by Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth Rahuri against Ahmednagar Zilla Shet Mazoor Union, various ret...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Workman to Be Represented by Trade Union Office Bearer in Domestic Inquiry — Vice-President of Union Held Entitled to Represent Member Under Section 22(2)(c) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Statutory Right Cannot Be Restricted by Union Constitution.

22 Nov 2006

The petitioner, Dastgir Alam Mulla, a plant-operator employed by Mysore Petrochemicals Limited since 1992, was suspended on 29-11-2004 and a chargeshe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Circular Denying Export Incentives to Purchasers from 100% EOU. Clarification That Exports Through EOUs Are Ineligible Under VKGUY Scheme Is Valid and Not Contrary to Foreign Trade Policy.

14 Feb 2020

The case involves appeals by M/s. Nola Ram Dulichand Dal Mills and others against the Union of India and others, challenging a circular dated 21st Jan...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Appellant's Registered Mark 'Nandi' Entitled to Protection Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'Nandini'. Prior Registration and Deceptive Similarity Establish Prima Facie Case for Injunction Under Sections 28, 29, 134, 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

17 Jul 2017

The appellant, Micro Hitech Industries, a sole proprietorship represented by its Karta and Proprietor Sri Goutam Kumar Babulal, filed a suit for perma...

High Court

Writ Appeals Filed by Tea and Coffee Plantation Companies Against Denial of Input Tax Credit on Cultivation Inputs under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Issue: Whether Cultivation Inputs Eligible for Tax Credit Under Section 10(2) Read with Section 2(6) and 2(19) of the Act.

28 Feb 2014

The appeals arose from reassessment orders passed under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, denying input tax credit to tea and coffee plantation...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Whether Settlement Under Industrial Disputes Act Bars Modification of Standing Orders. Court Analyzes Interplay Between Industrial Disputes Act and Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.

21 Mar 2022

The dispute arose when the management of Hindalco Industries Ltd. challenged the modification of certified standing orders enhancing the retirement ag...

18 19 20 21 22

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)