Search Results for "Time Limit"

Trending :

Supreme Court Allows Indian Railways' Appeals, Upholds Its Status as Deemed Dist...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Delay in Deposit of...
Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable for Dual Appointment and Forgery in...
Supreme Court Alters Conviction from Murder to Attempt to Murder in Absence of C...
Supreme Court Sets Aside Appointment Orders in Steel Plant Recruitment Case Due ...

Search Results for "Time Limit"

256 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 256 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Bank Account Suit — Plaint Rejected as Barred by Limitation Under Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963. Exchange of Correspondence Cannot Extend Limitation Once Right to Sue Accrues.

1 Jan 2020

The appellant, Shakti Bhog Food Industries Ltd., filed a civil suit in 2005 against the Central Bank of India and another respondent seeking a decree ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Revenue Authorities in Stamp Duty Undervaluation Cases — Revisional Powers Under Section 47A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Upheld. The Court held that the limitation period for suo motu revision by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority is five years from the date of the order, not from the date of registration.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from orders of the Madras High Court concerning the interpretation of Section 47A of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Deputy Collectors in Seniority Dispute Over Late Passing of Departmental Examination. The court held that seniority of direct recruits is determined by the order of merit in the selection list, not by the date of confirmation or passing of departmental examination, under Rule 12(1)(a) of the Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (General Conditions of Service) Rules, 1961.

1 Jan 2020

The case involves a dispute over seniority among Deputy Collectors in Madhya Pradesh. The appellant, Warad Murti Mishra, was selected by the Madhya Pr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Ruling That Time Limit Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act is Directory. The provision requiring District Magistrate to pass possession order within 30 days (extendable to 60 days) is directory, as non-compliance does not invalidate proceedings or prejudice the borrower.

1 Jan 2020

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that the time limit under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

1 Jan 2020

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Liberal Interpretation of Delay Condonation Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. High Court Erred in Dismissing Delay Condonation Application for 45 Days Without Considering Beneficial Nature of Legislation.

1 Jan 2020

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the deceased, aged 26, died in a collision with a negligently parked truck on 15.04.2011. The appel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Enforcement Case — Upholds Arbitral Award Despite Conflicting Jurisdiction Clauses. Court Holds That Where Multiple Agreements Contain Different Arbitration Clauses, a Common Arbitrator Can Be Appointed with Consent, and the Award Is Not Liable to Be Set Aside Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Jan 2020

The dispute arose between Quippo Construction Equipment Ltd. (appellant) and Janardan Nirman Pvt. Ltd. (respondent) concerning four agreements for hir...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Taxpayer Against Non-Processing of Income Tax Returns and Refund Claims. Mandamus Issued to Process Returns Under Section 143(1) Within Four Weeks, Subject to Section 143(1D) and Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 2020

The appellant, Vodafone Idea Ltd. (formerly Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd), is a telecommunications company that filed income tax returns for Assessmen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Execution of Foreign Decree Case, Holding Limitation Period of 12 Years Runs from Date of Foreign Decree. Bank of Baroda's Execution Petition Filed 14 Years After London Decree Held Time-Barred Under Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963.

1 Jan 2020

The case involves a dispute between Bank of Baroda (appellant) and Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. (respondent, successor of Vysya Bank) regarding the limita...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...

18 19 20 21 22

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)