Search Results for "State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission"

297 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 297 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Complaint for Non-Prosecution Due to COVID-19 Pandemic. Delay in Filing Process Caused by Court Closures and Advocate's Inability to Present Envelopes Held to Be Sufficient Ground for Restoration.

The petitioner, Deepak Sharma, filed a consumer complaint (Case No. 153/2021) before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur-First...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Withdrawal of Second Appeal in Consumer Dispute Due to Settlement. The appellant sought withdrawal of the complaint after settlement, and the Commission disposed of the appeal as withdrawn without adjudicating on merits.

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) was hearing a second appeal filed by Sreenivasan, proprietor of Garudan Appallam Company, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation Award in Medical Negligence Case Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court found deficiency in service due to inadequate post-operative monitoring and delayed intervention in treating a patient with aortic aneurysm, leading to death and warranting compensation.

The dispute arose from a complaint filed by the legal heirs of a deceased patient, Dinesh Jaiswal, against Bombay Hospital & Medical Research Centre a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Full Compensation in Bank Deficiency of Service Case — Insurance Claim Denied Due to Bank's Failure to Forward Premium. Concurrent findings of deficiency of service upheld; reduction of compensation from Rs 5 lakhs to Rs 2 lakhs by NCDRC set aside.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 25 October 2018, which reduced the compensation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for LIC Policyholder Due to Deficiency of Service in Jeevan Aastha Plan. LIC's failure to process proposal and wrongful retention of premium for five years amounts to deficiency of service under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appellant, Madhav Hari Joshi, submitted a proposal to the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) under its Jeevan Aastha Plan on 31 January 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Consumer Appeal Dismissed in Default by State Commission. Held that the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 does not bar restoration of appeals dismissed for non-prosecution and the State Commission has inherent power to restore such appeals.

The petitioner, Anita Chandrakant Patil, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 5.9.2014 passed by the Maharash...