Search Results for "Securitisation"

418 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 418 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against NCDRC Order Holding Bank Liable for Insurance Claim. Borrower's Acceptance of SCDRC Order and One-Time Settlement with Bank Precludes Liability.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State Bank of India and another against the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Bank's Writ Petition Against Sales Tax Tribunal's Refusal to Entertain Appeal Under Section 55 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 — Tribunal Directed to Decide Appeal on Merits

The petitioner, Shikshak Sahakari Bank Limited, a cooperative bank registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, filed a writ peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Magistrate to Decide SARFAESI Section 14 Application in Light of Amended Section 17(4A) - Tenancy Claims to be Decided by DRT. Writ Petition Disposed with Direction to Consider Amendment w.e.f. 1.9.2016.

The petitioner, Vijaya Bank, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the inaction of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Esplana...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Stays Coercive Recovery Against Mutual Fund in Income Tax Dispute on Trust's Status. Trust Assessed as Association of Persons Cannot Prima Facie Bind Beneficiary Due to Legal Precedent and Hasty Recovery Action Foreclosed Remedies Under Section 177(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The dispute arose from an assessment order for Assessment Year 2009-2010 passed against India Corporate Loan Securitisation Trust, 2008 Series 14, con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Allowing One Time Settlement in Debt Recovery Case — Interest Must Be Calculated as Per OTS Terms. The court held that the DRT erred in not giving effect to the OTS and in calculating interest beyond the OTS terms, and the DRAT correctly set aside the DRT order.

The petitioners, Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) and India SME Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd., challenged an order dated 26th Ma...