Search Results for "Representative appointment"

688 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 688 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Promotion to Law Officer Post in Municipal Corporation — Petitioner Not Entitled to Promotion as Appointment Was by Direct Recruitment and Petitioner Did Not Meet Eligibility Criteria.

The petitioner, Sanghmitra R. Sandansing, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai to promote her to t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Principal's Appointment in UGC Regulations Case — API Score Requirement Not Applicable to Already Working Principal Under Clause 4.2.0(iv).

The petitioner, Dr. Mohd. Asif Nabi Sheikh, filed a writ petition challenging the appointment of respondent no.3, Shyam Bhojraj Punde, as Principal of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Co-operative Tribunal Order — Dispute Regarding Land Purchase and Construction Not Maintainable Under Section 91 of MCS Act as It Involves Pre-Society Promoters' Agreement, Not a Society Dispute.

The petitioner, Mayfair Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 03/07/2006 of the President,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Receiver and Injunction in Loan Default Case. Loan Agreement and Mortgage by Deposit of Title Deeds Established Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Aditya Birla Finance Limited, a non-banking finance company, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restoring Arbitral Award in Shareholder Dispute. Court Holds That Single Judge Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting His Own View.

The case involves two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by M/s. Goldstar Metal Solutions Pvt. Ltd. and M/s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application Without Clause 12 Leave in Arbitration Dispute Over Pharmaceutical Supply Agreement. Court Holds That Section 11 Application Is Not a Suit and Leave Under Clause 12 of Letters Patent Is Not Required When Cause of Action Arises in Mumbai.

The applicant, VHB Life Sciences Limited, filed an application under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of ...