Search Results for "Production Before Court"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Production Before Court"

4900 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4900 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears CBI's Appeal Against Acquittal in British Minor's Death Case; Trial Court Found CBI Investigation Invalid Without Proper Authorization. The trial court held that the CBI chargesheet was a fresh one and not a supplementary chargesheet, and that no notification empowered the CBI to register a new FIR in Mumbai.

17 Jul 2019

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed an appeal under Section 378(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Default Bail in PC Act Case, Holds Detention Period of 60 Days Applies When Maximum Sentence is Not Explicitly at Least Ten Years. The Court Interprets 'Imprisonment for a Term Not Less Than Ten Years' in Section 167(2) CrPC to Grant Default Bail When Charge Sheet Not Filed Within 60 Days.

1 Aug 2026

These Special Leave Petitions were preferred against the order of the Gauhati High Court dated 11.01.2017 rejecting the bail application of the petiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Default Bail to Accused in Corruption Case Due to Expiry of 60-Day Detention Without Charge Sheet. Interpretation of 'Imprisonment for a Term Not Less Than Ten Years' Under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Clarified; Bail Right Accrues on Expiry of Maximum Detention Period, Not Defeated by Later Filing of Charge Sheet.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court addressed the right to default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in a case arising from a corruptio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Landlord's Appeal in Eviction Petition Under Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Due to Res Judicata. The Second Eviction Petition Was Barred as the First Petition's Dismissal for Failure to Prove Landlord-Tenant Relationship Constituted a Decision on Merits Under Order 17 Rule 3 CPC, Attaining Finality Under Section 11 CPC.

29 Mar 2023

The appeal originated from an eviction petition under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. The appellants, as landlords, filed a second eviction petition...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC Despite Subsequent Filing of Chargesheet. Indefeasible Right Accrues on Expiry of Statutory Period and Filing of Bail Application Before Chargesheet.

13 Mar 2020

The appellant, M. Ravindran, was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 04.08.2018 for offences under the NDPS Act. Under Section 36A(4) of the ...

High Court

KAHC010422252008_1

17 Dec 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging the Validity of State Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases. The Petitioners Seek Declaration that the Notification is Ultra Vires the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and the Constitution.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Direction for Accused on Anticipatory Bail to Obtain Regular Bail Despite Subsisting Anticipatory Bail. Filing of Charge-Sheet Does Not Terminate Anticipatory Bail Under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Now Section 482 of BNSS), and the Accused Need Not Seek Regular Bail.

23 Jun 2026

This criminal petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) was filed by three accused persons challenging orders ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a force majeure event under Clause 14 of the FOSFA 20 Contract, and enforcement of the award is not against public policy despite procedural irregularities.

22 Apr 2020

The case involves a dispute between National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a canalizing agency for the Government of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against High Court's Rs. 50 Lakh Cost and CBI Probe in Habeas Corpus Case Involving Allegations of Illegal Detention and Political Mudslinging. High Court Had Found the Petition an Abuse of Process, Imposed Costs, and Directed CBI Investigation Against the Petitioner.

1 Aug 2026

The appeal arose from an order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow Bench) dated 7 March 2011, dismissing a habeas corpus writ petiti...

18 19 20 21 22

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)