Search Results for "Maharashtra Relief Undertakings"

308 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 308 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MHADA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Court upholds MHADA's order directing petitioners to vacate and hand over possession of chawl rooms for redevelopment under Section 95A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

The petitioners, who are residents of Mohamed Tajbhai Chawl in Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Multinational Company in Rent Control Case. Section 3(1)(b) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 exempts premises let to multinational companies from protection of the Act, and concurrent findings of fact are not interfered with under Section 115 CPC.

The applicant, Eloff Hansson (India) Pvt. Ltd., was a tenant in office premises in Mumbai. The respondents, landlords, terminated the tenancy in 1993 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging BMC Water Charges Revision for Industrial Users — Resolution Held Valid Under Section 169 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Standing Committee's Power to Revise Water Charges Based on Consumption Upheld as Not Unconstitutional.

The petitioners, a company engaged in spinning and weaving textiles and its shareholder, challenged a resolution of the Standing Committee of the Brih...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Petition Seeking Recovery of Interim Wage Order Under Section 50 of MRTU & PULP Act. Section 50 Recovery Only Available for Final Orders Under Chapter VI, Not Interim Orders Under Section 30.

The petitioner, a trade union registered under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (MRTU &...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Disabled Employee Against Private Company for Violation of Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. Employer Directed to Re-Employ or Pay Compensation for Hearing Loss Acquired Due to Unsafe Work Environment.

The petitioner, Shree Satish Prabhakar Padhye, a person with hearing disability, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Restoration Applications in Eviction Disputes Due to Failure to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance. Order IX Rule 9 CPC Requires Satisfactory Explanation for Absence, Which Was Not Provided.

The judgment pertains to a group of civil applications filed by Lekhraj M. Solanki and Jasoda Lekhraj Solanki, the original plaintiffs, seeking restor...