Search Results for "Iron rod assault"

212 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 212 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Kidnapping Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Accused's Failure to Explain Disappearance of Deceased Leads to Guilt Under Sections 302, 364, 201 IPC.

The appellant, Bhimrao Bankar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur for the murder of his brother-in-law, Atul, under Section 302 IP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 302/149 IPC Set Aside

The appellants were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for offences under Sections 147, 148, and 302 read with 149 IPC for the murder ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Prabhakar Pandurang Tambe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for the murder of Rajendra Ingawale under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Sections 302, 326 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Yeshwant Mohite on 22nd December 2011. The appellants, Rahul Shinde and Ashok Shinde, were convicted under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Murder of Four Family Members in Brutal Robbery-Murder Case. Court Upholds Conviction Under Sections 302, 392, 449, 460, 201 IPC for Killing Two Adults and Two Children in Their Flat.

The case arises from a brutal murder of four members of a family in their flat in Pune. The accused, Bhagwat Bajirao Kale, was a labourer working at a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Sections 302 and 448 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sri Annappa Bhandary, was convicted by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Udupi (sitting at Kundapura) in S.C.No.29/2018 for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Murder Case Due to Incomplete Charge Sheet and Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC Allowed as Charge Sheet Not Filed Within Prescribed Period.

The petitioner, Akash Mann T., was arrested in connection with Crime No.368/2018 registered at Mahalakshmipuram Police Station, Bengaluru, for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Weak Circumstantial Evidence. Appeal Under Section 378 CrPC Challenges Acquittal for IPC Sections 302, 201, 404, 419 Based on Defective Recovery, Delay in FIR, and Unestablished Last Seen.

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) CrPC against the judgment of acquittal dated 08.08.2013 passed by the Fast Track C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Credible Evidence. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 302, 324 read with Section 34 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of four accused persons (Namdeo Haribhau Dayare, Sau. Malu Dyaneshwar Uike, Girish Uttamrao Ga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Under MPDA Act — Activities Relate to Law and Order, Not Public Order. Personal Dispute Between Co-Residents Does Not Affect Public Order Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, mother of the detenu Asif Abdul Ahad Shaikh, challenged a detention order dated 30 July 2005 passed under the Maharashtra Prevention o...