Search Results for "Intellectual Property"

285 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 285 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Contract Dispute. Court holds that balance of convenience and prima facie case did not favor grant of injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The Appellant, Chitali Bottling Limited, filed a Special Civil Suit No.95 of 2020 before the 19th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune, seeking a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Ex-Parte Ad-Interim Order in Trademark Infringement Suit for Lack of Jurisdiction. Suit filed without cause of action within court's territorial limits held void ab initio under Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The petitioner, M/s Fine Footwear Private Limited, was the first defendant in a civil suit (O.S. No.2598/2019) filed by the respondents (Skechers enti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains Encashment of Bank Guarantee in Arbitration Dispute Between Contractor and Sub-Contractor. Court finds that invocation of bank guarantee was fraudulent and would cause irretrievable injustice to the petitioner.

The petitioner, Simplex Infrastructure Limited, a civil and structural construction company, entered into a sub-contract with respondent No. 1, Siemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Royalty and Advance Tax Case — Payments for Equipment and Spare Parts Not Taxable as Royalty Under Section 9(1)(vi) of Income Tax Act, 1961. No Advance Tax Liability When Entire Income Subject to TDS.

The Revenue filed five appeals under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC020032022013_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Shareholders in Patent Ownership Suit — Applicants Holding 6.3% Shares Have Sufficient Interest in Subject Matter of Suit. Shareholders are proper parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC when the suit concerns company assets that affect share value.

The applicants, Percy Rutton Kavasmaneck and Aban Percy Kavasmaneck, filed a Chamber Summons seeking impleadment as party defendants in Suit No. 2932 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition as Foreign Company Failed to Comply with Registration Requirements Under Sections 592 and 599 of Companies Act, 1956. Petitioner, a foreign company with a place of business in India, cannot maintain a winding-up petition without registering under the Act.

The petitioner, Willis Europe B.V., a company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands with its principal place of business in the United Kingdo...