Search Results for "ICICI Bank"

416 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 416 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Pronounces Order on Writ Petition No. 26754 of 2025 Challenging PMLA Arrest and ECIR Jurisdiction. The court examined the legality of arrest under Section 19 of Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 based on ECIR registered in Gangtok, Sikkim.

The writ petition was filed by the wife of K.C. Veerendra, who was arrested on 23.08.2025 pursuant to ECIR/BGZO/19/2025 under the Prevention of Money-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Arrest Order Against Guarantors in DRT Recovery Proceedings — Recovery Officer Cannot Order Arrest Without Prior Notice and Hearing Under Section 25 of RDDBFI Act, 1993

The petitioners, Kishor K. Mehta and Rajesh K. Mehta, were directors and guarantors of Beautiful Diamonds Company Limited, which had availed loan faci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Assignee Bank Can Invoke SARFAESI Act for Debt Assigned by NBFC. The case involves interpretation of 'debt' and 'secured creditor' under SARFAESI Act, 2002 and RDDBFI Act, 1993, and the effect of assignment from a non-banking financial company to a bank.

The petitioner, a banking company, sought to enforce security interest under the SARFAESI Act after acquiring a debt and underlying security from a no...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Application for Appointment of Receiver in Partition Suit. Notice of Motion Seeks Interim Relief for Joint Family Properties Allegedly Misappropriated by Co-Owners.

The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration that he is entitled to a 1/10th share in the assets and properties of the joint family and for partition by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summons in Cheating Case for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction and Non-Disclosure of Offence. The court held that the Magistrate at Indore had no jurisdiction as no cause of action arose there, and the complaint did not disclose any offence under Sections 420 or 406 IPC.

The petitioners challenged the summons issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Indore under Sections 420 or 406 read with Section 120-B ...