WRIT PETITION NO.388 OF 2016
19 Dec 2016The petitioners, a company importing and supplying ATMs to State Bank of India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challengin...
Search Results for "Export Goods"
814 result(s) found
Found 814 result(s)
High Court
High Court Allows Bail in Customs Act Case, Quashes Magistrate's Order Due to Illegal Arrest and Bailable Offence Classification. Petitioners Released on Bail with Conditions
6 Feb 2026The High Court of Bombay allowed a criminal writ petition challenging the denial of bail to petitioners accused under the Customs Act, 1962. The petit...
- 1155
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Steel Products Classified as 'Angles, Shapes and Sections' Under Section 4A of Central Excise Act, 1944. Court holds that MRP-based valuation applies only when product is covered by Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and rules thereunder.
27 Sep 2013The judgment involves three writ appeals filed by M/s Meenakshi Steel Re-rolling Mills and M/s Bhuwalka Steel Industries Limited against the Union of ...
- 103
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Sales Tax Dispute Over Time Charter Agreement — Holds That Time Charter Is a Service Contract, Not Transfer of Right to Use Goods. The Court ruled that a time charter does not involve transfer of possession or control, thus not taxable under Section 5C of Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.
4 Dec 2019The appellant, The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd., owned a tug named 'Kumari Tarini' and entered into a Time Charter Agreement dated 8.1.1998 with th...
- 200
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Advance Authorizations Under Foreign Trade Policy — Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind by DGFT. The court quashed cancellation orders and directed fresh hearing, holding that quasi-judicial authorities must follow principles of natural justice before revoking licenses under the Foreign Trade Policy.
13 Jul 2018The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by Taj Agro Commodities Pvt. Ltd., Shadi-Ram & Sons Pvt. Ltd., and Himatlal Hirji & Co. challengin...
- 38
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Customs Duty Settlement Case — Upholds Settlement Commission's Rejection for Non-Disclosure. Settlement Commission's Finding of Non-Disclosure of Full Facts Under Section 127C of Customs Act, 1962 Not Interfered With as Not Perverse.
25 Jun 2015The appellants, including M/s C S India and its partners, filed a writ appeal before the Karnataka High Court challenging the order of a learned Singl...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Customs Duty Case. Settlement Commission's order upheld as valid exercise of power under Section 127H of Customs Act, 1962 granting immunity from interest.
13 Oct 2010The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Customs, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...
- 122
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Sales Tax Reference by Dealer in Setoff Disallowance Case. Rule 41D of Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 restricts setoff to raw materials and consumable stores, not capital assets like scientific equipment used for research and development.
10 Feb 2015The case is a sales tax reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from an order of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal date...
- 97
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Prohibitory Order Under Regulation 21 of CHALR, 2004 — No Appeal Lies to CESTAT. Regulation 22(8) of CHALR, 2004 is Not Ultra Vires the Customs Act, 1962.
5 Apr 2013The appeal arises from a decision of the CESTAT dated 2 January 2013, which held that an appeal is not maintainable against an order passed under Regu...
- 132
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Jurisdiction of Customs Settlement Commission Under Sections 127A and 127B of the Customs Act, 1962 in Ten Writ Petitions. Whether Settlement Commission’s Authority Extends Beyond Short Levy Due to Misclassification to Cases Involving Fraud Is the Central Question.
21 Jul 2005The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard ten writ petitions together, all involving a common legal question concerning the jurisdiction of the Set...
- 14
